Background: Protein misfolding is the main cause of a group of fatal
neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In particular, in
Prion- related diseases the normal cellular form of the Prion Protein
PrP (PrPC) is converted into the infectious PrPSc through a
conformational process during which it acquires a high beta-sheet
content. Doppel is a protein that shares a similar native fold, but
lacks the scrapie isoform. Understanding the molecular determinants of
these different behaviours is important both for biomedical and
biophysical research.
Results: In this paper, the dynamical and energetic properties of the
two proteins in solution is comparatively analyzed by means of long
time scale explicit solvent, all- atom molecular dynamics in different
temperature conditions. The trajectories are analyzed by means of a
recently introduced energy decomposition approach (Tiana et al, Prot.
Sci. 2004) aimed at identifying the key residues for the stabilization
and folding of the protein. Our analysis shows that Prion and Doppel
have two different cores stabilizing the native state and that the
relative contribution of the nucleus to the global stability of the
protein for Doppel is sensitively higher than for PrP. Moreover, under
misfolding conditions the Doppel core is conserved, while the energy
stabilization network of PrP is disrupted.
Conclusion: These observations suggest that different sequences can
share similar native topology with different stabilizing interactions
and that the sequences of the Prion and Doppel proteins may have
diverged under different evolutionary constraints resulting in
different folding and stabilization mechanisms.
%0 Journal Article
%1 ISI:000240813500001
%A Colacino, Stefano
%A Tiana, Guido
%A Colombo, Giorgio
%C MIDDLESEX HOUSE, 34-42 CLEVELAND ST, LONDON W1T 4LB, ENGLAND
%D 2006
%I BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
%J BMC STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
%K different folds mechanisms similar stabilization with
%R 10.1186/1472-6807-6-17
%T Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of
prion and doppel proteins
%V 6
%X Background: Protein misfolding is the main cause of a group of fatal
neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In particular, in
Prion- related diseases the normal cellular form of the Prion Protein
PrP (PrPC) is converted into the infectious PrPSc through a
conformational process during which it acquires a high beta-sheet
content. Doppel is a protein that shares a similar native fold, but
lacks the scrapie isoform. Understanding the molecular determinants of
these different behaviours is important both for biomedical and
biophysical research.
Results: In this paper, the dynamical and energetic properties of the
two proteins in solution is comparatively analyzed by means of long
time scale explicit solvent, all- atom molecular dynamics in different
temperature conditions. The trajectories are analyzed by means of a
recently introduced energy decomposition approach (Tiana et al, Prot.
Sci. 2004) aimed at identifying the key residues for the stabilization
and folding of the protein. Our analysis shows that Prion and Doppel
have two different cores stabilizing the native state and that the
relative contribution of the nucleus to the global stability of the
protein for Doppel is sensitively higher than for PrP. Moreover, under
misfolding conditions the Doppel core is conserved, while the energy
stabilization network of PrP is disrupted.
Conclusion: These observations suggest that different sequences can
share similar native topology with different stabilizing interactions
and that the sequences of the Prion and Doppel proteins may have
diverged under different evolutionary constraints resulting in
different folding and stabilization mechanisms.
@article{ISI:000240813500001,
abstract = {{Background: Protein misfolding is the main cause of a group of fatal
neurodegenerative diseases in humans and animals. In particular, in
Prion- related diseases the normal cellular form of the Prion Protein
PrP (PrPC) is converted into the infectious PrPSc through a
conformational process during which it acquires a high beta-sheet
content. Doppel is a protein that shares a similar native fold, but
lacks the scrapie isoform. Understanding the molecular determinants of
these different behaviours is important both for biomedical and
biophysical research.
Results: In this paper, the dynamical and energetic properties of the
two proteins in solution is comparatively analyzed by means of long
time scale explicit solvent, all- atom molecular dynamics in different
temperature conditions. The trajectories are analyzed by means of a
recently introduced energy decomposition approach (Tiana et al, Prot.
Sci. 2004) aimed at identifying the key residues for the stabilization
and folding of the protein. Our analysis shows that Prion and Doppel
have two different cores stabilizing the native state and that the
relative contribution of the nucleus to the global stability of the
protein for Doppel is sensitively higher than for PrP. Moreover, under
misfolding conditions the Doppel core is conserved, while the energy
stabilization network of PrP is disrupted.
Conclusion: These observations suggest that different sequences can
share similar native topology with different stabilizing interactions
and that the sequences of the Prion and Doppel proteins may have
diverged under different evolutionary constraints resulting in
different folding and stabilization mechanisms.}},
added-at = {2009-01-13T23:30:30.000+0100},
address = {{MIDDLESEX HOUSE, 34-42 CLEVELAND ST, LONDON W1T 4LB, ENGLAND}},
affiliation = {{Colombo, G (Reprint Author), CNR, Ist Chim Riconoscimento Mol, Via Mario Bianco 9, I-10131 Milan, Italy.
CNR, Ist Chim Riconoscimento Mol, I-10131 Milan, Italy.
Univ Milan, Dipartimento Fis, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, I-20133 Milan, Italy.}},
article-number = {{17}},
author = {Colacino, Stefano and Tiana, Guido and Colombo, Giorgio},
author-email = {{colastef@infinito.it
guido.tiana@unimi.it
giorgio.colombo@icrm.cnr.it}},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/282034a63f0190775583e79b01879d6f3/huiyangsfsu},
cited-references = {{BERENDSEN HJC, 1984, J CHEM PHYS, V81, P3684.
BERENDSEN HJC, 1987, J PHYS CHEM-US, V91, P6269.
BERENDSEN HJC, 1995, COMPUT PHYS COMMUN, V91, P43.
BOUTONNET N, 1995, PROT ENG, P647.
COLACINO S, 2006, PROTEINS, V62, P698, DOI 10.1002/prot.20804.
CONWAY KA, 2000, BIOCHEMISTRY-US, V39, P2552.
DAURA X, 1998, J MOL BIOL, V280, P925.
DEMORI GMS, 2004, J PHYS CHEM B, V108, P12267, DOI 10.1021/jp0477699.
DOBSON CM, 2001, BIOCHEM SOC SYMP, P1.
FERNANDEZ A, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI US.
HESS B, 1997, J COMPUT CHEM, V18, P1463.
HORNSHAW MP, 1995, BIOCHEM BIOPH RES CO, V207, P621.
KOVACS GG, 2002, J NEUROL, V249, P1567, DOI 10.1007/s00415-002-0896-9.
KUZNETSOV IB, 2004, PROTEIN SCI, V13, P3230, DOI 10.1110/ps.04833404.
LINDAHL E, 2001, J MOL MODEL, V7, P306.
LUHRS T, 2003, J MOL BIOL, V326, P1549, DOI 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01471-7.
MIYAMOTO S, 1992, J COMPUT CHEM, V13, P952.
MO H, 2001, P NATL ACAD SCI US.
MOUILLETRICHARD S, 2000, SCIENCE, V289, P1925.
PAN KM, 1993, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V90, P10962.
PRUSINER SB, 1991, SCIENCE, V252, P1515.
PRUSINER SB, 1998, CELL, V93, P337.
PRUSINER SB, 1998, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V95, P13363.
RAGONA L, 2005, PROTEINS, V61, P366, DOI 10.1002/prot.20493.
SAKAGUCHI S, 1996, NATURE, V380, P528.
SETTANNI G, 2002, BIOPHYS J, V83, P3533.
SPOEL D, 2004, GROMACS USER MANUAL.
SWIETNICKI W, 1997, J BIOL CHEM, V272, P27517.
TIANA G, 2004, PROTEIN SCI, V13, P113, DOI 10.1110/ps.03223804.
VANGUNSTEREN WF, 1998, ENCY COMPUTATIONAL C, V2, P1211.
VILES JH, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P2042.
WHYTE SM, 2003, BIOCHEM J 2, V373, P485, DOI 10.1042/BJ20021911.
WILLE H, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P3563.
ZAHN R, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V97, P145.
ZAHN R, 2003, J MOL BIOL, V326, P225, DOI 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01332-3.
ZIEGLER J, 2003, J BIOL CHEM, V27, P50157.}},
doc-delivery-number = {{088LP}},
doi = {{10.1186/1472-6807-6-17}},
interhash = {c951a144f4b241bf49001b01f38b5e76},
intrahash = {82034a63f0190775583e79b01879d6f3},
issn = {{1471-2237}},
journal = {{BMC STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY}},
journal-iso = {{BMC Struct. Biol.}},
keywords = {different folds mechanisms similar stabilization with},
keywords-plus = {{MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; COPPER-BINDING; NMR STRUCTURE; STABILITY;
DETERMINANTS; SIMULATIONS; MUTATIONS; DISEASE; BIOLOGY; MUTANT}},
language = {{English}},
month = {{JUL 21}},
number-of-cited-references = {{36}},
publisher = {{BIOMED CENTRAL LTD}},
subject-category = {{Biophysics}},
times-cited = {{2}},
timestamp = {2009-01-13T23:30:30.000+0100},
title = {{Similar folds with different stabilization mechanisms: the cases of
prion and doppel proteins}},
type = {{Article}},
unique-id = {{ISI:000240813500001}},
volume = {{6}},
year = {{2006}}
}