%0 Conference Paper %1 maiden94 %A Maiden, N. A. M. %A Sutcliffe, A. G. %B First International Conference on Requirements Engineering %D 1994 %J Requirements Engineering, 1994., Proceedings of the First International Conference on %K requirements comprehension %P 184--193 %T Requirements critiquing using domain abstractions %U http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=292386 %X Reusing domain abstractions representing key domain features has been shown to aid requirement specification, however their role in requirements engineering has not been investigated thoroughly. This paper proposes domain abstractions to aid requirements critiquing as well as specification, thus maximising the payoff from retrieving domain abstractions. The requirements critic is part of a prototype intelligent requirements engineering toolkit being developed as part of the Nature project, ESPRIT basic research action 6353. The critic retrieves domain abstractions to validate requirement specifications for problems including incompleteness, inconsistencies and ambiguities. Intelligent, mixed initiative dialogue between the critic and requirements engineer permits requirements critiquing at the right time and level of abstraction

@inproceedings{maiden94, abstract = {Reusing domain abstractions representing key domain features has been shown to aid requirement specification, however their role in requirements engineering has not been investigated thoroughly. This paper proposes domain abstractions to aid requirements critiquing as well as specification, thus maximising the payoff from retrieving domain abstractions. The requirements critic is part of a prototype intelligent requirements engineering toolkit being developed as part of the Nature project, ESPRIT basic research action 6353. The critic retrieves domain abstractions to validate requirement specifications for problems including incompleteness, inconsistencies and ambiguities. Intelligent, mixed initiative dialogue between the critic and requirements engineer permits requirements critiquing at the right time and level of abstraction}, added-at = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, author = {Maiden, N. A. M. and Sutcliffe, A. G.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/285807ec93ac11cfd41dd569ae9ea409e/neilernst}, booktitle = {First International Conference on Requirements Engineering}, citeulike-article-id = {384158}, comment = {- fairly old work - idea is to use a domain model (composed by who, I don't know) to allow the RE to get closer to the user - the domain model can then use a series of if-then rules to prompt during the acquisition and critiquing process - no empirical assessment (at least in this paper)}, description = {sdasda}, interhash = {04c7b4bd54d7bec566599e94e2595bad}, intrahash = {85807ec93ac11cfd41dd569ae9ea409e}, journal = {Requirements Engineering, 1994., Proceedings of the First International Conference on}, keywords = {requirements comprehension}, pages = {184--193}, priority = {0}, timestamp = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, title = {Requirements critiquing using domain abstractions}, url = {http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=292386}, year = 1994 }