Quantitative studies of literature. A critique and an outlook
W. van Peer. Computers and the Humanities, (1989)10.1007/BF02176635.
Abstract
The present paper is a critique of quantitative studies of literature.
It is argued that such studies are involved in an act of reification,
in which, moreover, fundamental ingredients of the texts, e.g. their
(highly important) range of figurative meanings, are eliminated from
the analysis. Instead a concentration on lower levels of linguistic
organization, such as grammar and lexis, may be observed, in spite
of the fact that these are often the least relevant aspects of the
text. In doing so, quantitative studies of literature significantly
reduce not only the cultural value of texts, but also the generalizability
of its own findings. What is needed, therefore, is an awareness and
readiness to relate to matters of textuality as an organizing principle
underlying the cultural functioning of literary works of art.
%0 Journal Article
%1 springerlink:10.1007/BF02176635
%A van Peer, W.
%D 1989
%I Springer Netherlands
%J Computers and the Humanities
%K digitalHumanities stilistika
%P 301-307
%T Quantitative studies of literature. A critique and an outlook
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02176635
%V 23
%X The present paper is a critique of quantitative studies of literature.
It is argued that such studies are involved in an act of reification,
in which, moreover, fundamental ingredients of the texts, e.g. their
(highly important) range of figurative meanings, are eliminated from
the analysis. Instead a concentration on lower levels of linguistic
organization, such as grammar and lexis, may be observed, in spite
of the fact that these are often the least relevant aspects of the
text. In doing so, quantitative studies of literature significantly
reduce not only the cultural value of texts, but also the generalizability
of its own findings. What is needed, therefore, is an awareness and
readiness to relate to matters of textuality as an organizing principle
underlying the cultural functioning of literary works of art.
@article{springerlink:10.1007/BF02176635,
abstract = {The present paper is a critique of quantitative studies of literature.
It is argued that such studies are involved in an act of reification,
in which, moreover, fundamental ingredients of the texts, e.g. their
(highly important) range of figurative meanings, are eliminated from
the analysis. Instead a concentration on lower levels of linguistic
organization, such as grammar and lexis, may be observed, in spite
of the fact that these are often the least relevant aspects of the
text. In doing so, quantitative studies of literature significantly
reduce not only the cultural value of texts, but also the generalizability
of its own findings. What is needed, therefore, is an awareness and
readiness to relate to matters of textuality as an organizing principle
underlying the cultural functioning of literary works of art.},
added-at = {2011-08-11T13:13:39.000+0200},
affiliation = {University of Utrecht Dept. of Literary Theory Muntstraat 4 3512 EV
Utrecht The Netherlands},
author = {van Peer, W.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/290d33252c356935930fa3a1148e16b53/filologanoga},
interhash = {28978f42e5d48e1e351ac8f9060f62e4},
intrahash = {90d33252c356935930fa3a1148e16b53},
issn = {0010-4817},
issue = {4},
journal = {Computers and the Humanities},
keyword = {Computer Science},
keywords = {digitalHumanities stilistika},
note = {10.1007/BF02176635},
pages = {301-307},
publisher = {Springer Netherlands},
timestamp = {2011-08-11T13:13:39.000+0200},
title = {Quantitative studies of literature. A critique and an outlook},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02176635},
volume = 23,
year = 1989
}