For the past two years a high-level but quiet debate has been under
way that will shape the future of GNSS user equipment. At issue:
design of the common L1 civil signal planned for broadcast from future
GPS and Galileo satellites. This is the third installment of an exclusive
Inside GNSS series in which a US/EU technical working group and GNSS
manufacturers have discussed the common GPS /Galileo L1 civil signal
design. Should it be a binary offset carrier (BOC) or multiplexed
BOC (MBOC)? The choice will determine the direction � and fortunes
� of the industry for decades to come.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Gibbons2006
%A Gibbons, G.
%A Fenton, P.
%A Garin, L.
%A Hatch, R.
%A Kawazoe, T.
%A Keegan, R.
%A Knight, J.
%A Kohli, S.
%A Rowitch, D.
%A Sheynblat, L.
%A Stratton, A.
%A Studenny, J.
%A Turetzky, G.
%A Weill, L.
%D 2006
%J Inside GNSS
%K BOC, GPS, Galileo, MBOC, signalDetection
%P 28-45
%T BOC or MBOC ? The Common GPS /Galileo Civil Signal Design: A Manufacturers
Dialog, Part 2
%X For the past two years a high-level but quiet debate has been under
way that will shape the future of GNSS user equipment. At issue:
design of the common L1 civil signal planned for broadcast from future
GPS and Galileo satellites. This is the third installment of an exclusive
Inside GNSS series in which a US/EU technical working group and GNSS
manufacturers have discussed the common GPS /Galileo L1 civil signal
design. Should it be a binary offset carrier (BOC) or multiplexed
BOC (MBOC)? The choice will determine the direction � and fortunes
� of the industry for decades to come.
@article{Gibbons2006,
abstract = {For the past two years a high-level but quiet debate has been under
way that will shape the future of GNSS user equipment. At issue:
design of the common L1 civil signal planned for broadcast from future
GPS and Galileo satellites. This is the third installment of an exclusive
Inside GNSS series in which a US/EU technical working group and GNSS
manufacturers have discussed the common GPS /Galileo L1 civil signal
design. Should it be a binary offset carrier (BOC) or multiplexed
BOC (MBOC)? The choice will determine the direction � and fortunes
� of the industry for decades to come.},
added-at = {2011-05-30T10:41:10.000+0200},
author = {Gibbons, G. and Fenton, P. and Garin, L. and Hatch, R. and Kawazoe, T. and Keegan, R. and Knight, J. and Kohli, S. and Rowitch, D. and Sheynblat, L. and Stratton, A. and Studenny, J. and Turetzky, G. and Weill, L.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a0ca30c86f88495726d15320658ca3e8/bmuth},
groups = {private},
interhash = {bb11615e4b8f8083309fc8224dada03f},
intrahash = {a0ca30c86f88495726d15320658ca3e8},
journal = {Inside GNSS},
keywords = {BOC, GPS, Galileo, MBOC, signalDetection},
month = {September},
owner = {bmuth},
pages = {28-45},
timestamp = {2014-08-11T22:37:44.000+0200},
title = {{BOC or MBOC ? The Common GPS /Galileo Civil Signal Design: A Manufacturers
Dialog, Part 2}},
username = {bmuth},
year = 2006
}