Extract from introduction: To learn more about how speakers and addressees manage to accurately produce and comprehend complex and potentially ambiguous sentences in real time, and how they may use these sentences for a whole range of intentions, we have to turn to psycholinguistics and social psychology, respectively. So let us sample some of the recent findings in these fields, and see if and how they might benefit computational linguistics. Interestingly, we will find many places where more attention to what goes on in computational linguistics would benefit psychologists as well.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Krahmer:2010:CLL:1810270.1810277
%A Krahmer, Emiel
%C Cambridge, MA, USA
%D 2010
%I MIT Press
%J Comput. Linguist.
%K computational linguistics
%P 285--294
%R 10.1162/coli.2010.36.2.36201
%T What computational linguists can learn from psychologists (and vice versa)
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/coli.2010.36.2.36201
%V 36
%X Extract from introduction: To learn more about how speakers and addressees manage to accurately produce and comprehend complex and potentially ambiguous sentences in real time, and how they may use these sentences for a whole range of intentions, we have to turn to psycholinguistics and social psychology, respectively. So let us sample some of the recent findings in these fields, and see if and how they might benefit computational linguistics. Interestingly, we will find many places where more attention to what goes on in computational linguistics would benefit psychologists as well.
@article{Krahmer:2010:CLL:1810270.1810277,
abstract = {Extract from introduction: To learn more about how speakers and addressees manage to accurately produce and comprehend complex and potentially ambiguous sentences in real time, and how they may use these sentences for a whole range of intentions, we have to turn to psycholinguistics and social psychology, respectively. So let us sample some of the recent findings in these fields, and see if and how they might benefit computational linguistics. Interestingly, we will find many places where more attention to what goes on in computational linguistics would benefit psychologists as well.},
acmid = {1810277},
added-at = {2011-06-16T12:33:19.000+0200},
address = {Cambridge, MA, USA},
author = {Krahmer, Emiel},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a0efaedd3047e123c3adb9db9f048be4/jennymac},
description = {Citation},
doi = {10.1162/coli.2010.36.2.36201},
interhash = {f8fe2fb24badda4a2b15bcf91cf2caa7},
intrahash = {a0efaedd3047e123c3adb9db9f048be4},
issn = {0891-2017},
issue = {2},
journal = {Comput. Linguist.},
keywords = {computational linguistics},
numpages = {10},
pages = {285--294},
publisher = {MIT Press},
timestamp = {2011-06-16T12:33:19.000+0200},
title = {What computational linguists can learn from psychologists (and vice versa)},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/coli.2010.36.2.36201},
volume = 36,
year = 2010
}