%0 Conference Paper %1 AlAlam:2016:RRC:2961111.2962629 %A Al Alam, S. M. Didar %A Pfahl, Dietmar %A Ruhe, Guenther %B Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement %C New York, NY, USA %D 2016 %I ACM %K product.planning release.planning %P 27:1--27:7 %R 10.1145/2961111.2962629 %T Release Readiness Classification: An Explorative Case Study %U http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2961111.2962629 %X Context: To survive in a highly competitive software market, product managers are striving for frequent, incremental releases in ever shorter cycles. Release decisions are characterized by high complexity and have a high impact on project success. Under such conditions, using the experience from past releases could help product managers to take more informed decisions. Goal and research objectives: To make decisions about when to make a release more operational, we formulated release readiness (RR) as a binary classification problem. The goal of our research presented in this paper is twofold: (i) to propose a machine learning approach called RC* (Release readiness Classification applying predictive techniques) with two approaches for defining the training set called incremental and sliding window, and (ii) to empirically evaluate the applicability of RC* for varying project characteristics. Methodology: In the form of explorative case study research, we applied the RC* method to four OSS projects under the Apache Software Foundation. We retrospectively covered a period of 82 months, 90 releases and 3722 issues. We use Random Forest as the classification technique along with eight independent variables to classify release readiness in individual weeks. Predictive performance was measured in terms of precision, recall, F-measure, and accuracy. Results: The incremental and sliding window approaches respectively achieve an overall 76% and 79% accuracy in classifying RR for four analyzed projects. Incremental approach outperforms sliding window approach in terms of stability of the predictive performance. Predictive performance for both approaches are significantly influenced by three project characteristics i) release duration, ii) number of issues in a release, iii) size of the initial training dataset. Conclusion: As our initial observation we identified, incremental approach achieves higher accuracy when releases have long duration, low number of issues and classifiers are trained with large training set. On the other hand, sliding window approach achieves higher accuracy when releases have short duration and classifiers are trained with small training set. %@ 978-1-4503-4427-2

@inproceedings{AlAlam:2016:RRC:2961111.2962629, abstract = {Context: To survive in a highly competitive software market, product managers are striving for frequent, incremental releases in ever shorter cycles. Release decisions are characterized by high complexity and have a high impact on project success. Under such conditions, using the experience from past releases could help product managers to take more informed decisions. Goal and research objectives: To make decisions about when to make a release more operational, we formulated release readiness (RR) as a binary classification problem. The goal of our research presented in this paper is twofold: (i) to propose a machine learning approach called RC* (Release readiness Classification applying predictive techniques) with two approaches for defining the training set called incremental and sliding window, and (ii) to empirically evaluate the applicability of RC* for varying project characteristics. Methodology: In the form of explorative case study research, we applied the RC* method to four OSS projects under the Apache Software Foundation. We retrospectively covered a period of 82 months, 90 releases and 3722 issues. We use Random Forest as the classification technique along with eight independent variables to classify release readiness in individual weeks. Predictive performance was measured in terms of precision, recall, F-measure, and accuracy. Results: The incremental and sliding window approaches respectively achieve an overall 76% and 79% accuracy in classifying RR for four analyzed projects. Incremental approach outperforms sliding window approach in terms of stability of the predictive performance. Predictive performance for both approaches are significantly influenced by three project characteristics i) release duration, ii) number of issues in a release, iii) size of the initial training dataset. Conclusion: As our initial observation we identified, incremental approach achieves higher accuracy when releases have long duration, low number of issues and classifiers are trained with large training set. On the other hand, sliding window approach achieves higher accuracy when releases have short duration and classifiers are trained with small training set.}, acmid = {2962629}, added-at = {2017-01-26T15:53:38.000+0100}, address = {New York, NY, USA}, articleno = {27}, author = {Al Alam, S. M. Didar and Pfahl, Dietmar and Ruhe, Guenther}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2a26a9bf2f2153b43173e2b888c95685b/ispma}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement}, doi = {10.1145/2961111.2962629}, interhash = {6c125b90f7bc57d9ff89925736d6021b}, intrahash = {a26a9bf2f2153b43173e2b888c95685b}, isbn = {978-1-4503-4427-2}, keywords = {product.planning release.planning}, location = {Ciudad Real, Spain}, numpages = {7}, pages = {27:1--27:7}, publisher = {ACM}, series = {ESEM '16}, timestamp = {2017-01-26T15:53:38.000+0100}, title = {Release Readiness Classification: An Explorative Case Study}, url = {http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2961111.2962629}, year = 2016 }