A new method for the determination and extraction of ethinyl estradiol and etonogestrel was developed for a pharmaceutical product consisting of a solid copolymer intrauterine ring for subsequent simultaneous quantification by ultraviolet-visible derivative spectrophotometry. The spectral variables were optimized for first derivative spectrophotometry with a smoothing factor of 4000 and an amplification factor of 10,000. A wavelength of 291.5nm was selected for the determination of ethinyl estradiol by a graphical method, while for etonogestrel, zero-crossing was used at 249.5nm. The limits of detection and quantification for ethinyl estradiol were 9.5x10(-7) and 9.0x10(-6)mol/L and 1.1x10(-6) and 3.2x10(-6)mol/L for etonogestrel, respectively. For the extraction method, the variables affecting the analytical signal were the extraction solvent, temperature, and extraction time; optimized conditions were 180min at 76 +/- 2 degrees C in acetonitrile. The method was applied successfully for the first time to analyze intrauterine contraceptive rings. The sample contained 11.7mg etonogestrel and 2.7mg ethinyl estradiol; the recoveries were 93.6 +/- 1.1% etonogestrel and 97.9 +/- 1.5% ethinyl estradiol relative to the nominal concentration. The importance of this method involves its implementation in pharmaceutical laboratories.
%0 Journal Article
%1 RN231
%A Toral, M.I.
%A Nacaratte, F.
%A Nova, F.
%D 2015
%J Analytical Letters
%K contraceptive cyproterone-acetate, desogestrel, dqcauchile estradiol, ethinyl etonogestrel, formulation, intrauterine mass-spectrometry, pharmaceutical plasma properties, release ring, spectrophotometry,
%N 6
%P 1009-1020
%R 10.1080/00032719.2014.968930
%T Determination of Etonogestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol from an Intrauterine Contraceptive Ring by Extraction and Derivative Spectrophotometry
%U /brokenurl#<Go to ISI>://WOS:000348519800011
%V 48
%X A new method for the determination and extraction of ethinyl estradiol and etonogestrel was developed for a pharmaceutical product consisting of a solid copolymer intrauterine ring for subsequent simultaneous quantification by ultraviolet-visible derivative spectrophotometry. The spectral variables were optimized for first derivative spectrophotometry with a smoothing factor of 4000 and an amplification factor of 10,000. A wavelength of 291.5nm was selected for the determination of ethinyl estradiol by a graphical method, while for etonogestrel, zero-crossing was used at 249.5nm. The limits of detection and quantification for ethinyl estradiol were 9.5x10(-7) and 9.0x10(-6)mol/L and 1.1x10(-6) and 3.2x10(-6)mol/L for etonogestrel, respectively. For the extraction method, the variables affecting the analytical signal were the extraction solvent, temperature, and extraction time; optimized conditions were 180min at 76 +/- 2 degrees C in acetonitrile. The method was applied successfully for the first time to analyze intrauterine contraceptive rings. The sample contained 11.7mg etonogestrel and 2.7mg ethinyl estradiol; the recoveries were 93.6 +/- 1.1% etonogestrel and 97.9 +/- 1.5% ethinyl estradiol relative to the nominal concentration. The importance of this method involves its implementation in pharmaceutical laboratories.
@article{RN231,
abstract = {A new method for the determination and extraction of ethinyl estradiol and etonogestrel was developed for a pharmaceutical product consisting of a solid copolymer intrauterine ring for subsequent simultaneous quantification by ultraviolet-visible derivative spectrophotometry. The spectral variables were optimized for first derivative spectrophotometry with a smoothing factor of 4000 and an amplification factor of 10,000. A wavelength of 291.5nm was selected for the determination of ethinyl estradiol by a graphical method, while for etonogestrel, zero-crossing was used at 249.5nm. The limits of detection and quantification for ethinyl estradiol were 9.5x10(-7) and 9.0x10(-6)mol/L and 1.1x10(-6) and 3.2x10(-6)mol/L for etonogestrel, respectively. For the extraction method, the variables affecting the analytical signal were the extraction solvent, temperature, and extraction time; optimized conditions were 180min at 76 +/- 2 degrees C in acetonitrile. The method was applied successfully for the first time to analyze intrauterine contraceptive rings. The sample contained 11.7mg etonogestrel and 2.7mg ethinyl estradiol; the recoveries were 93.6 +/- 1.1% etonogestrel and 97.9 +/- 1.5% ethinyl estradiol relative to the nominal concentration. The importance of this method involves its implementation in pharmaceutical laboratories.},
added-at = {2019-12-04T03:57:35.000+0100},
author = {Toral, M.I. and Nacaratte, F. and Nova, F.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b6067abaf9bea1dedff9529041898faa/dqcauchile},
doi = {10.1080/00032719.2014.968930},
interhash = {6b6bd524e5c05400a5d9ec0d2c530ec2},
intrahash = {b6067abaf9bea1dedff9529041898faa},
issn = {0003-2719},
journal = {Analytical Letters},
keywords = {contraceptive cyproterone-acetate, desogestrel, dqcauchile estradiol, ethinyl etonogestrel, formulation, intrauterine mass-spectrometry, pharmaceutical plasma properties, release ring, spectrophotometry,},
number = 6,
pages = {1009-1020},
timestamp = {2019-12-04T03:58:17.000+0100},
title = {Determination of Etonogestrel and Ethinyl Estradiol from an Intrauterine Contraceptive Ring by Extraction and Derivative Spectrophotometry},
type = {Journal Article},
url = {/brokenurl#<Go to ISI>://WOS:000348519800011},
volume = 48,
year = 2015
}