To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V cavity filled with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention n. Materials and Methodology -Class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. Teeth were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10).Group 1 -Restored with Flowable Composite .Group 2-Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement.Group 3- Restored with Cention N. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling. Specimens were stained with 0.1% Methylene Blue Dye and evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Results - According to the results, Group 1 (Flowable composite) exhibited the highest micro leakage followed by Group 2(Glass Ionomer) and least microleakage was shown by Group 3(Cention N). Conclusion- All materials showed some microleakage at the cervical margin of restoration. However, Group 3(Cention N) exhibited lowest microleakage .
Описание
Comparison of Microleakage In Class V Cavity Restored with Flowable Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer Cement and Cention N. | Samanta | Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
%0 Journal Article
%1 samanta2017comparison
%A Samanta, Soumita
%A Das, Utpal Kumar
%A Mitra, Aditya
%D 2017
%J Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research
%K cavity class comparison microleakage restored
%N 8
%T Comparison of Microleakage In Class V Cavity Restored with Flowable Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer Cement and Cention N.
%U http://www.imperialjournals.com/index.php/IJIR/article/view/5476
%V 3
%X To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V cavity filled with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention n. Materials and Methodology -Class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. Teeth were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10).Group 1 -Restored with Flowable Composite .Group 2-Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement.Group 3- Restored with Cention N. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling. Specimens were stained with 0.1% Methylene Blue Dye and evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Results - According to the results, Group 1 (Flowable composite) exhibited the highest micro leakage followed by Group 2(Glass Ionomer) and least microleakage was shown by Group 3(Cention N). Conclusion- All materials showed some microleakage at the cervical margin of restoration. However, Group 3(Cention N) exhibited lowest microleakage .
@article{samanta2017comparison,
abstract = { To compare and evaluate the microleakage in class V cavity filled with flowable composite resin, glass ionomer cement and cention n. Materials and Methodology -Class V cavities were prepared in 30 freshly extracted teeth. Teeth were randomly assigned into three experimental groups (n = 10).Group 1 -Restored with Flowable Composite .Group 2-Restored with Glass Ionomer Cement.Group 3- Restored with Cention N. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling. Specimens were stained with 0.1% Methylene Blue Dye and evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Results - According to the results, Group 1 (Flowable composite) exhibited the highest micro leakage followed by Group 2(Glass Ionomer) and least microleakage was shown by Group 3(Cention N). Conclusion- All materials showed some microleakage at the cervical margin of restoration. However, Group 3(Cention N) exhibited lowest microleakage . },
added-at = {2017-08-25T09:44:39.000+0200},
author = {Samanta, Soumita and Das, Utpal Kumar and Mitra, Aditya},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b8ad5528710c00b44faf9ec1337d2ab1/ijirjournal},
description = {Comparison of Microleakage In Class V Cavity Restored with Flowable Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer Cement and Cention N. | Samanta | Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research},
id = {5476},
interhash = {2220227f458d140674e91101696a10df},
intrahash = {b8ad5528710c00b44faf9ec1337d2ab1},
issn = {2454-1362},
journal = {Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research},
keywords = {cavity class comparison microleakage restored},
number = 8,
source = {Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research},
timestamp = {2017-08-25T09:44:39.000+0200},
title = {Comparison of Microleakage In Class V Cavity Restored with Flowable Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer Cement and Cention N.},
type = {Text.Serial.Journal},
uri = {http://www.imperialjournals.com/index.php/IJIR},
url = {http://www.imperialjournals.com/index.php/IJIR/article/view/5476},
volume = 3,
year = 2017
}