Information comprehension: Handwritten vs. typed notes
K. Duran, und C. Frederick. Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences, (2013)
Zusammenfassung
Ever advancing trends in technology, and implemented in educational settings, inspired the current study, which examined the impact, on comprehension, of note-taking method. 72 undergraduate participants, aged 18-26, viewed a projected documentary in a classroom setting and took notes for a later assessment via either paper or computer keyboard. The Mann-Whitney U (Ryan & Joiner, 2001) showed a significant difference between the test scores produced via typed notes and written notes (p = .006). Experimental and survey results converge and dictate that the best and preferred practice for student note taking is writing.
%0 Journal Article
%1 duran2013information
%A Duran, Karen S
%A Frederick, Christina M
%D 2013
%I Kappa Omicron Nu
%J Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences
%K cognition comprehension embodied handwriting typing חומרילימוד
%N 1
%T Information comprehension: Handwritten vs. typed notes
%U https://www.kon.org/urc/v12/duran.html
%V 12
%X Ever advancing trends in technology, and implemented in educational settings, inspired the current study, which examined the impact, on comprehension, of note-taking method. 72 undergraduate participants, aged 18-26, viewed a projected documentary in a classroom setting and took notes for a later assessment via either paper or computer keyboard. The Mann-Whitney U (Ryan & Joiner, 2001) showed a significant difference between the test scores produced via typed notes and written notes (p = .006). Experimental and survey results converge and dictate that the best and preferred practice for student note taking is writing.
@article{duran2013information,
abstract = {Ever advancing trends in technology, and implemented in educational settings, inspired the current study, which examined the impact, on comprehension, of note-taking method. 72 undergraduate participants, aged 18-26, viewed a projected documentary in a classroom setting and took notes for a later assessment via either paper or computer keyboard. The Mann-Whitney U (Ryan & Joiner, 2001) showed a significant difference between the test scores produced via typed notes and written notes (p = .006). Experimental and survey results converge and dictate that the best and preferred practice for student note taking is writing.},
added-at = {2018-12-28T15:58:42.000+0100},
author = {Duran, Karen S and Frederick, Christina M},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bb424a67d4ed9534e7a918213c313892/yish},
interhash = {2e0860704e8adbb456f8bf3bea8d40e1},
intrahash = {bb424a67d4ed9534e7a918213c313892},
journal = {Undergraduate Research Journal for the Human Sciences},
keywords = {cognition comprehension embodied handwriting typing חומרילימוד},
number = 1,
publisher = {Kappa Omicron Nu},
timestamp = {2018-12-28T15:58:42.000+0100},
title = {Information comprehension: Handwritten vs. typed notes},
url = {https://www.kon.org/urc/v12/duran.html},
volume = 12,
year = 2013
}