%0 Journal Article %1 thelwall2014distributions %A Thelwall, Mike %A Wilson, Paul %D 2014 %J Journal of Informetrics %K distributions hooked law power thelwall %N 4 %P 824 - 839 %R http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.001 %T Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years %U http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157714000698 %V 8 %X Abstract The citations to a set of academic articles are typically unevenly shared, with many articles attracting few citations and few attracting many. It is important to know more precisely how citations are distributed in order to help statistical analyses of citations, especially for sets of articles from a single discipline and a small range of years, as normally used for research evaluation. This article fits discrete versions of the power law, the lognormal distribution and the hooked power law to 20 different Scopus categories, using citations to articles published in 2004 and ignoring uncited articles. The results show that, despite its popularity, the power law is not a suitable model for collections of articles from a single subject and year, even for the purpose of estimating the slope of the tail of the citation data. Both the hooked power law and the lognormal distributions fit best for some subjects but neither is a universal optimal choice and parameter estimates for both seem to be unreliable. Hence only the hooked power law and discrete lognormal distributions should be considered for subject-and-year-based citation analysis in future and parameter estimates should always be interpreted cautiously.

@article{thelwall2014distributions, abstract = {Abstract The citations to a set of academic articles are typically unevenly shared, with many articles attracting few citations and few attracting many. It is important to know more precisely how citations are distributed in order to help statistical analyses of citations, especially for sets of articles from a single discipline and a small range of years, as normally used for research evaluation. This article fits discrete versions of the power law, the lognormal distribution and the hooked power law to 20 different Scopus categories, using citations to articles published in 2004 and ignoring uncited articles. The results show that, despite its popularity, the power law is not a suitable model for collections of articles from a single subject and year, even for the purpose of estimating the slope of the tail of the citation data. Both the hooked power law and the lognormal distributions fit best for some subjects but neither is a universal optimal choice and parameter estimates for both seem to be unreliable. Hence only the hooked power law and discrete lognormal distributions should be considered for subject-and-year-based citation analysis in future and parameter estimates should always be interpreted cautiously. }, added-at = {2015-07-30T16:26:25.000+0200}, author = {Thelwall, Mike and Wilson, Paul}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bcb41d6f2169dd12d2c651d955820fab/sdo}, description = {Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.001}, interhash = {a54797c09a6ae1c5dddc2feedc130062}, intrahash = {bcb41d6f2169dd12d2c651d955820fab}, issn = {1751-1577}, journal = {Journal of Informetrics }, keywords = {distributions hooked law power thelwall}, number = 4, pages = {824 - 839}, timestamp = {2015-07-30T16:26:25.000+0200}, title = {Distributions for cited articles from individual subjects and years }, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157714000698}, volume = 8, year = 2014 }