%0 Generic %1 collaboration2021energy %A Collaboration, DES %A Abbott, T. M. C. %A Aguena, M. %A Alarcon, A. %A Allam, S. %A Alves, O. %A Amon, A. %A Andrade-Oliveira, F. %A Annis, J. %A Avila, S. %A Bacon, D. %A Baxter, E. %A Bechtol, K. %A Becker, M. R. %A Bernstein, G. M. %A Bhargava, S. %A Birrer, S. %A Blazek, J. %A Brandao-Souza, A. %A Bridle, S. L. %A Brooks, D. %A Buckley-Geer, E. %A Burke, D. L. %A Camacho, H. %A Campos, A. %A Rosell, A. Carnero %A Kind, M. Carrasco %A Carretero, J. %A Castander, F. J. %A Cawthon, R. %A Chang, C. %A Chen, A. %A Chen, R. %A Choi, A. %A Conselice, C. %A Cordero, J. %A Costanzi, M. %A Crocce, M. %A da Costa, L. N. %A Pereira, M. E. da Silva %A Davis, C. %A Davis, T. M. %A De Vicente, J. %A DeRose, J. %A Desai, S. %A Di Valentino, E. %A Diehl, H. T. %A Dietrich, J. P. %A Dodelson, S. %A Doel, P. %A Doux, C. %A Drlica-Wagner, A. %A Eckert, K. %A Eifler, T. F. %A Elsner, F. %A Elvin-Poole, J. %A Everett, S. %A Evrard, A. E. %A Fang, X. %A Farahi, A. %A Fernandez, E. %A Ferrero, I. %A Ferté, A. %A Fosalba, P. %A Friedrich, O. %A Frieman, J. %A García-Bellido, J. %A Gatti, M. %A Gaztanaga, E. %A Gerdes, D. W. %A Giannantonio, T. %A Giannini, G. %A Gruen, D. %A Gruendl, R. A. %A Gschwend, J. %A Gutierrez, G. %A Harrison, I. %A Hartley, W. G. %A Herner, K. %A Hinton, S. R. %A Hollowood, D. L. %A Honscheid, K. %A Hoyle, B. %A Huff, E. M. %A Huterer, D. %A Jain, B. %A James, D. J. %A Jarvis, M. %A Jeffrey, N. %A Jeltema, T. %A Kovacs, A. %A Krause, E. %A Kron, R. %A Kuehn, K. %A Kuropatkin, N. %A Lahav, O. %A Leget, P. F. %A Lemos, P. %A Liddle, A. R. %A Lidman, C. %A Lima, M. %A Lin, H. %A MacCrann, N. %A Maia, M. A. G. %A Marshall, J. L. %A Martini, P. %A McCullough, J. %A Melchior, P. %A Mena-Fernández, J. %A Menanteau, F. %A Miquel, R. %A Mohr, J. J. %A Morgan, R. %A Muir, J. %A Myles, J. %A Nadathur, S. %A Navarro-Alsina, A. %A Nichol, R. C. %A Ogando, R. L. C. %A Omori, Y. %A Palmese, A. %A Pandey, S. %A Park, Y. %A Paz-Chinchón, F. %A Petravick, D. %A Pieres, A. %A Malagón, A. A. Plazas %A Porredon, A. %A Prat, J. %A Raveri, M. %A Rodriguez-Monroy, M. %A Rollins, R. P. %A Romer, A. K. %A Roodman, A. %A Rosenfeld, R. %A Ross, A. J. %A Rykoff, E. S. %A Samuroff, S. %A Sánchez, C. %A Sanchez, E. %A Sanchez, J. %A Cid, D. Sanchez %A Scarpine, V. %A Schubnell, M. %A Scolnic, D. %A Secco, L. F. %A Serrano, S. %A Sevilla-Noarbe, I. %A Sheldon, E. %A Shin, T. %A Smith, M. %A Soares-Santos, M. %A Suchyta, E. %A Swanson, M. E. C. %A Tabbutt, M. %A Tarle, G. %A Thomas, D. %A To, C. %A Troja, A. %A Troxel, M. A. %A Tucker, D. L. %A Tutusaus, I. %A Varga, T. N. %A Walker, A. R. %A Weaverdyck, N. %A Weller, J. %A Yanny, B. %A Yin, B. %A Zhang, Y. %A Zuntz, J. %D 2021 %K tifr %T Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing %U http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13549 %X We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $Łambda$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^+0.017_-0.017$ and matter density $Ømega_m = 0.339^+0.032_-0.031$ in $Łambda$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^+0.026_-0.024$, $Ømega_m = 0.352^+0.035_-0.041$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^+0.32_-0.20$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^+0.008_-0.008$, $Ømega_m = 0.306^+0.004_-0.005$, $h=0.680^+0.004_-0.003$, and $m_\nu<0.13 \;eV\; (95\% \;CL)$ in $Łambda$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^+0.008_-0.008$, $Ømega_m = 0.302^+0.006_-0.006$, $h=0.687^+0.006_-0.007$, and $w=-1.031^+0.030_-0.027$ in $w$CDM. (abridged)

@misc{collaboration2021energy, abstract = {We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^{+0.017}_{-0.017}$ and matter density $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.339^{+0.032}_{-0.031}$ in $\Lambda$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^{+0.026}_{-0.024}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.352^{+0.035}_{-0.041}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^{+0.32}_{-0.20}$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.306^{+0.004}_{-0.005}$, $h=0.680^{+0.004}_{-0.003}$, and $\sum m_{\nu}<0.13 \;\mathrm{eV\; (95\% \;CL)}$ in $\Lambda$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.302^{+0.006}_{-0.006}$, $h=0.687^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, and $w=-1.031^{+0.030}_{-0.027}$ in $w$CDM. (abridged)}, added-at = {2021-05-31T07:50:31.000+0200}, author = {Collaboration, DES and Abbott, T. M. C. and Aguena, M. and Alarcon, A. and Allam, S. and Alves, O. and Amon, A. and Andrade-Oliveira, F. and Annis, J. and Avila, S. and Bacon, D. and Baxter, E. and Bechtol, K. and Becker, M. R. and Bernstein, G. M. and Bhargava, S. and Birrer, S. and Blazek, J. and Brandao-Souza, A. and Bridle, S. L. and Brooks, D. and Buckley-Geer, E. and Burke, D. L. and Camacho, H. and Campos, A. and Rosell, A. Carnero and Kind, M. Carrasco and Carretero, J. and Castander, F. J. and Cawthon, R. and Chang, C. and Chen, A. and Chen, R. and Choi, A. and Conselice, C. and Cordero, J. and Costanzi, M. and Crocce, M. and da Costa, L. N. and Pereira, M. E. da Silva and Davis, C. and Davis, T. M. and De Vicente, J. and DeRose, J. and Desai, S. and Di Valentino, E. and Diehl, H. T. and Dietrich, J. P. and Dodelson, S. and Doel, P. and Doux, C. and Drlica-Wagner, A. and Eckert, K. and Eifler, T. F. and Elsner, F. and Elvin-Poole, J. and Everett, S. and Evrard, A. E. and Fang, X. and Farahi, A. and Fernandez, E. and Ferrero, I. and Ferté, A. and Fosalba, P. and Friedrich, O. and Frieman, J. and García-Bellido, J. and Gatti, M. and Gaztanaga, E. and Gerdes, D. W. and Giannantonio, T. and Giannini, G. and Gruen, D. and Gruendl, R. A. and Gschwend, J. and Gutierrez, G. and Harrison, I. and Hartley, W. G. and Herner, K. and Hinton, S. R. and Hollowood, D. L. and Honscheid, K. and Hoyle, B. and Huff, E. M. and Huterer, D. and Jain, B. and James, D. J. and Jarvis, M. and Jeffrey, N. and Jeltema, T. and Kovacs, A. and Krause, E. and Kron, R. and Kuehn, K. and Kuropatkin, N. and Lahav, O. and Leget, P. F. and Lemos, P. and Liddle, A. R. and Lidman, C. and Lima, M. and Lin, H. and MacCrann, N. and Maia, M. A. G. and Marshall, J. L. and Martini, P. and McCullough, J. and Melchior, P. and Mena-Fernández, J. and Menanteau, F. and Miquel, R. and Mohr, J. J. and Morgan, R. and Muir, J. and Myles, J. and Nadathur, S. and Navarro-Alsina, A. and Nichol, R. C. and Ogando, R. L. C. and Omori, Y. and Palmese, A. and Pandey, S. and Park, Y. and Paz-Chinchón, F. and Petravick, D. and Pieres, A. and Malagón, A. A. Plazas and Porredon, A. and Prat, J. and Raveri, M. and Rodriguez-Monroy, M. and Rollins, R. P. and Romer, A. K. and Roodman, A. and Rosenfeld, R. and Ross, A. J. and Rykoff, E. S. and Samuroff, S. and Sánchez, C. and Sanchez, E. and Sanchez, J. and Cid, D. Sanchez and Scarpine, V. and Schubnell, M. and Scolnic, D. and Secco, L. F. and Serrano, S. and Sevilla-Noarbe, I. and Sheldon, E. and Shin, T. and Smith, M. and Soares-Santos, M. and Suchyta, E. and Swanson, M. E. C. and Tabbutt, M. and Tarle, G. and Thomas, D. and To, C. and Troja, A. and Troxel, M. A. and Tucker, D. L. and Tutusaus, I. and Varga, T. N. and Walker, A. R. and Weaverdyck, N. and Weller, J. and Yanny, B. and Yin, B. and Zhang, Y. and Zuntz, J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c930c345ebf91511a0954f16ec839533/citekhatri}, description = {Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing}, interhash = {03b209822437c9af0cbcbdd796826c97}, intrahash = {c930c345ebf91511a0954f16ec839533}, keywords = {tifr}, note = {cite arxiv:2105.13549Comment: See https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ for the full DES Y3 3x2pt cosmology release}, timestamp = {2021-05-31T07:50:31.000+0200}, title = {Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13549}, year = 2021 }