%0 Journal Article %1 ingold2011network %A Ingold, K. %D 2011 %I Blackwell Publishing Inc %J Policy Studies Journal %K luxi %N 3 %P 435--459 %R 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x %T Network Structures Within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x %V 39 %X The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a prominent approach to investigate the formation of coalition and their impact on policy outputs. Although the ACF combines both the network structures of a political process with actors' values and belief systems, most empirical tests focus mainly on beliefs rather than network structures. Considering a relational approach makes particular sense when one wants to investigate the structural patterns of a subsystem and to assess coalition formation and maintenance. The author therefore proceeds by taking two steps to study the existence of coalitions, power relations, and policy preferences: first, social network analysis frames the empirical study of network structures, based on the assumption that common beliefs are reflected in relations among actors involved in policy processes. Second, using a sophisticated mathematical algorithm, the multicriteria analysis furnishes a systematic evaluation of the elite's belief system. This methodological combination constitutes the added value of this research and allows for testing to establish if common beliefs are reflected in network structures.

@article{ingold2011network, abstract = {The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a prominent approach to investigate the formation of coalition and their impact on policy outputs. Although the ACF combines both the network structures of a political process with actors' values and belief systems, most empirical tests focus mainly on beliefs rather than network structures. Considering a relational approach makes particular sense when one wants to investigate the structural patterns of a subsystem and to assess coalition formation and maintenance. The author therefore proceeds by taking two steps to study the existence of coalitions, power relations, and policy preferences: first, social network analysis frames the empirical study of network structures, based on the assumption that common beliefs are reflected in relations among actors involved in policy processes. Second, using a sophisticated mathematical algorithm, the multicriteria analysis furnishes a systematic evaluation of the elite's belief system. This methodological combination constitutes the added value of this research and allows for testing to establish if common beliefs are reflected in network structures.}, added-at = {2012-09-18T11:03:47.000+0200}, author = {Ingold, K.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cb5214a0dbd18e067dbe0befbde6709e/max.schubiger}, description = {Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy - Ingold - 2011 - Policy Studies Journal - Wiley Online Library}, doi = {10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x}, interhash = {00da74ffd4dc884cdc3b7f848715f838}, intrahash = {cb5214a0dbd18e067dbe0befbde6709e}, issn = {1541-0072}, journal = {Policy Studies Journal}, keywords = {luxi}, number = 3, pages = {435--459}, publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Inc}, timestamp = {2012-11-13T17:45:28.000+0100}, title = {Network Structures Within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x}, volume = 39, year = 2011 }