This paper adopts a resource-based perspective to understand why some universities are more successful than others at generating technology-based spinoff companies. In this respect, we derive eight hypotheses that link attributes of resources and capabilities, institutional, financial, commercial and human capital, to university spinoff outcomes. Using panel data from 1980 to 2001, our econometric estimators reveal evidence of history dependence for successful technology transfer to occur although faculty quality, size and orientation of science and engineering funding and commercial capability were also found to be predictors of university spinoff activity. We conclude by drawing implications for policy makers and university heads.
:Users/Miguel/Dropbox/Escola/Artigos/O'Shea et al.\_2005\_Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities.pdf:pdf
%0 Journal Article
%1 O'Shea2005
%A O'Shea, Rory P.
%A Allen, Thomas J.
%A Chevalier, Arnaud
%A Roche, Frank
%D 2005
%J Research Policy
%K Resource-based entrepreneurship,University spinoffs transfer,University view,Technology
%N 7
%P 994--1009
%R 10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
%T Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities
%U http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733305001162
%V 34
%X This paper adopts a resource-based perspective to understand why some universities are more successful than others at generating technology-based spinoff companies. In this respect, we derive eight hypotheses that link attributes of resources and capabilities, institutional, financial, commercial and human capital, to university spinoff outcomes. Using panel data from 1980 to 2001, our econometric estimators reveal evidence of history dependence for successful technology transfer to occur although faculty quality, size and orientation of science and engineering funding and commercial capability were also found to be predictors of university spinoff activity. We conclude by drawing implications for policy makers and university heads.
@article{O'Shea2005,
abstract = {This paper adopts a resource-based perspective to understand why some universities are more successful than others at generating technology-based spinoff companies. In this respect, we derive eight hypotheses that link attributes of resources and capabilities, institutional, financial, commercial and human capital, to university spinoff outcomes. Using panel data from 1980 to 2001, our econometric estimators reveal evidence of history dependence for successful technology transfer to occur although faculty quality, size and orientation of science and engineering funding and commercial capability were also found to be predictors of university spinoff activity. We conclude by drawing implications for policy makers and university heads.},
added-at = {2012-02-27T06:11:36.000+0100},
author = {O'Shea, Rory P. and Allen, Thomas J. and Chevalier, Arnaud and Roche, Frank},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e28edfedc29e18f0c075ed117e1003a6/kamil205},
doi = {10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011},
file = {:Users/Miguel/Dropbox/Escola/Artigos/O'Shea et al.\_2005\_Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities.pdf:pdf},
interhash = {43bb75ad988a7da56bbcbf0a4d1ae73c},
intrahash = {e28edfedc29e18f0c075ed117e1003a6},
issn = {00487333},
journal = {Research Policy},
keywords = {Resource-based entrepreneurship,University spinoffs transfer,University view,Technology},
month = sep,
number = 7,
pages = {994--1009},
timestamp = {2012-02-27T06:11:39.000+0100},
title = {{Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities}},
url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733305001162},
volume = 34,
year = 2005
}