This volume comprises ten essays that mediate between Scholastic concerns and contemporary philosophical issues. Nicholas Rescher suggests that the Scholastic era -- the 500-year period from Abelard to Suarez -- was a model of philosophical activity. More than at any other stage of history, philosophy stood at the center of academic and intellectual culture. And many of the criticisms of the Scholastic thinkers voiced since that time -- their preoccupation with subtle distinctions and logic-chopping, for example -- fail to do justice to the seriousness of their concerns and to the fact that their subtleties generally served a clear purpose with regard to the clarification of significant philosophical issues. (publisher, edited)
%0 Journal Article
%1 rescher_scholastic_2005
%A Rescher, Nicholas.
%D 2005
%J 2005
%K Aufsatz Gott Metaphysik Nikolaus_von_Kues
%T Scholastic Meditations (Studies in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, Volume 44).
%X This volume comprises ten essays that mediate between Scholastic concerns and contemporary philosophical issues. Nicholas Rescher suggests that the Scholastic era -- the 500-year period from Abelard to Suarez -- was a model of philosophical activity. More than at any other stage of history, philosophy stood at the center of academic and intellectual culture. And many of the criticisms of the Scholastic thinkers voiced since that time -- their preoccupation with subtle distinctions and logic-chopping, for example -- fail to do justice to the seriousness of their concerns and to the fact that their subtleties generally served a clear purpose with regard to the clarification of significant philosophical issues. (publisher, edited)
@article{rescher_scholastic_2005,
abstract = {This volume comprises ten essays that mediate between Scholastic concerns and contemporary philosophical issues. Nicholas Rescher suggests that the Scholastic era -- the 500-year period from Abelard to Suarez -- was a model of philosophical activity. More than at any other stage of history, philosophy stood at the center of academic and intellectual culture. And many of the criticisms of the Scholastic thinkers voiced since that time -- their preoccupation with subtle distinctions and logic-chopping, for example -- fail to do justice to the seriousness of their concerns and to the fact that their subtleties generally served a clear purpose with regard to the clarification of significant philosophical issues. (publisher, edited)},
added-at = {2009-02-21T16:26:41.000+0100},
author = {Rescher, Nicholas.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e630cf538d6bde59c5b01f857bb49515/sbbdbs},
interhash = {dc2ed22c284b2b0a935f6b52234eade0},
intrahash = {e630cf538d6bde59c5b01f857bb49515},
journal = 2005,
keywords = {Aufsatz Gott Metaphysik Nikolaus_von_Kues},
timestamp = {2009-02-21T16:27:22.000+0100},
title = {Scholastic Meditations {(Studies} in Philosophy and the History of Philosophy, Volume 44).},
year = 2005
}