Designing and Evaluating a Semantic Annotation Scheme for Compound Nouns
D. Séaghdha. Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, UK, (2007)
Abstract
There is no standard set of semantic relations for classifying noun-noun compounds. This paper describes the development of a new annotation scheme which fulfils a number of desirable criteria. A rigorous dual-annotator experiment indicates that reasonably good agreement can be achieved but that the task remains a very difficult one. Analysis of the annotators' disagreements suggests which categories are most problematic and identifies specific cases for which the annotation guidelines could be further refined. Nonetheless there is a very long tail of disagreement patterns which render infeasible the production of fully exhaustive guidelines.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 OSeaghdha:07a
%A Séaghdha, Diarmuid Ó
%B Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics Conference
%C Birmingham, UK
%D 2007
%K 2007 annotation compounds nlp
%T Designing and Evaluating a Semantic Annotation Scheme for Compound Nouns
%U http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~do242/Papers/dos_cl2007.pdf
%X There is no standard set of semantic relations for classifying noun-noun compounds. This paper describes the development of a new annotation scheme which fulfils a number of desirable criteria. A rigorous dual-annotator experiment indicates that reasonably good agreement can be achieved but that the task remains a very difficult one. Analysis of the annotators' disagreements suggests which categories are most problematic and identifies specific cases for which the annotation guidelines could be further refined. Nonetheless there is a very long tail of disagreement patterns which render infeasible the production of fully exhaustive guidelines.
@inproceedings{OSeaghdha:07a,
abstract = {There is no standard set of semantic relations for classifying noun-noun compounds. This paper describes the development of a new annotation scheme which fulfils a number of desirable criteria. A rigorous dual-annotator experiment indicates that reasonably good agreement can be achieved but that the task remains a very difficult one. Analysis of the annotators' disagreements suggests which categories are most problematic and identifies specific cases for which the annotation guidelines could be further refined. Nonetheless there is a very long tail of disagreement patterns which render infeasible the production of fully exhaustive guidelines.},
added-at = {2008-08-14T17:32:10.000+0200},
address = {Birmingham, UK},
author = {Séaghdha, Diarmuid Ó},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f07b10c09fcdc98677277993f8b172ff/seandalai},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th Corpus Linguistics Conference},
interhash = {fa56f444b65a40a265073379cf533d80},
intrahash = {f07b10c09fcdc98677277993f8b172ff},
keywords = {2007 annotation compounds nlp},
timestamp = {2008-08-14T17:32:13.000+0200},
title = {Designing and Evaluating a Semantic Annotation Scheme for Compound Nouns},
url = {http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~do242/Papers/dos_cl2007.pdf},
year = 2007
}