Revision from translators’ point of view: An interview study
S. Claire Yi-yi. Target: International Journal on Translation Studies, (2006)
Abstract
Although generally agreed to be an essential part of translation, revision receives little attention in translation studies with only a few exceptions such as Breedveld (2002) and Englund Dimitrova (2005). This study aims to establish what revision means to practicing translators, and their views as to what revision involves, in terms of the numbers of revisions they do, the length of their drawer-time (how long they put their draft away) and the aspects they check for in revision. Data show that translators typically claim to revise their draft translation once or twice. They do not normally have extended drawer-time. If they do, it would be overnight at most. They also describe themselves as having certain specific aspects in mind when they revise.
%0 Journal Article
%1 ClaireYi-yi2006
%A Claire Yi-yi, Shih
%D 2006
%J Target: International Journal on Translation Studies
%K - LA Revisiones Traducci{\'{o}}n spa
%T Revision from translators’ point of view: An interview study
%U http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=45B6A952496471ED6F75
%V 18
%X Although generally agreed to be an essential part of translation, revision receives little attention in translation studies with only a few exceptions such as Breedveld (2002) and Englund Dimitrova (2005). This study aims to establish what revision means to practicing translators, and their views as to what revision involves, in terms of the numbers of revisions they do, the length of their drawer-time (how long they put their draft away) and the aspects they check for in revision. Data show that translators typically claim to revise their draft translation once or twice. They do not normally have extended drawer-time. If they do, it would be overnight at most. They also describe themselves as having certain specific aspects in mind when they revise.
%Z Language: spa
@article{ClaireYi-yi2006,
abstract = {Although generally agreed to be an essential part of translation, revision receives little attention in translation studies with only a few exceptions such as Breedveld (2002) and Englund Dimitrova (2005). This study aims to establish what revision means to practicing translators, and their views as to what revision involves, in terms of the numbers of revisions they do, the length of their drawer-time (how long they put their draft away) and the aspects they check for in revision. Data show that translators typically claim to revise their draft translation once or twice. They do not normally have extended drawer-time. If they do, it would be overnight at most. They also describe themselves as having certain specific aspects in mind when they revise.},
added-at = {2015-12-01T11:35:13.000+0100},
annote = {Language: spa},
author = {{Claire Yi-yi}, Shih},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fb9d18a87c62d5ae0c014c5383340f33/sofiagruiz92},
interhash = {c343e61eda34d14509097bc0709eaf13},
intrahash = {fb9d18a87c62d5ae0c014c5383340f33},
journal = {Target: International Journal on Translation Studies},
keywords = {- LA Revisiones Traducci{\'{o}}n spa},
timestamp = {2015-12-01T11:35:13.000+0100},
title = {{Revision from translators’ point of view: An interview study}},
url = {http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=45B6A952496471ED6F75},
volume = 18,
year = 2006
}