Nowadays a scientific community can use different electronic publishing systems for the e-journals (journal management systems). Open-source ones were developed solely for e-publications' management and now, in 2007, we can say three of them are of general use for e-journals: Digital Publishing System (DPubs), ePublishing toolkit (ePubTk), Open Journal System (OJS). There exists also different content management systems (CMS), yet those were not primarily built for e-journals and are usable only with a special publication module. Finally, the third option is to pay for a service of different publishers and providers with their own publication systems. This paper deals with comparison of the first two options: specialised systems for e-journals on one side and general CMS on the other side. With examples of open-source publication systems we want to compare their advantages and disadvantages, area of aplication, and their functions for the management of the e-journal publishing process.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 citeulike:1610674
%A Chýla, Roman
%D 2007
%J Proceedings CASLIN 2007
%K online_publishing open_source
%T What open source webpublishing software has the scientific community for ejournals?
%U http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00010870/01/rchyla_open-source_e-journal_systems.pdf
%X Nowadays a scientific community can use different electronic publishing systems for the e-journals (journal management systems). Open-source ones were developed solely for e-publications' management and now, in 2007, we can say three of them are of general use for e-journals: Digital Publishing System (DPubs), ePublishing toolkit (ePubTk), Open Journal System (OJS). There exists also different content management systems (CMS), yet those were not primarily built for e-journals and are usable only with a special publication module. Finally, the third option is to pay for a service of different publishers and providers with their own publication systems. This paper deals with comparison of the first two options: specialised systems for e-journals on one side and general CMS on the other side. With examples of open-source publication systems we want to compare their advantages and disadvantages, area of aplication, and their functions for the management of the e-journal publishing process.
@inproceedings{citeulike:1610674,
abstract = {Nowadays a scientific community can use different electronic publishing systems for the e-journals (journal management systems). Open-source ones were developed solely for e-publications' management and now, in 2007, we can say three of them are of general use for e-journals: Digital Publishing System (DPubs), ePublishing toolkit (ePubTk), Open Journal System (OJS). There exists also different content management systems (CMS), yet those were not primarily built for e-journals and are usable only with a special publication module. Finally, the third option is to pay for a service of different publishers and providers with their own publication systems. This paper deals with comparison of the first two options: specialised systems for e-journals on one side and general CMS on the other side. With examples of open-source publication systems we want to compare their advantages and disadvantages, area of aplication, and their functions for the management of the e-journal publishing process.},
added-at = {2007-11-22T18:12:11.000+0100},
author = {Chýla, Roman},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2fbfd6a172f7efb953940c14dfa60e5fb/jsicot},
citeulike-article-id = {1610674},
interhash = {62b0ef4a608bedf88aa42798da37cdf8},
intrahash = {fbfd6a172f7efb953940c14dfa60e5fb},
journal = {Proceedings CASLIN 2007},
keywords = {online_publishing open_source},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2007-11-23T12:09:40.000+0100},
title = {What open source webpublishing software has the scientific community for ejournals?},
url = {http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00010870/01/rchyla_open-source_e-journal_systems.pdf},
year = 2007
}