%0 Journal Article %1 Betts:1997 %A Betts, Richard K. %D 1997 %J World Politics %K geopolitics methodology security strategic theory %N 1 %P 7--33 %T Should Strategic Studies Survive? %V 50 %X Political science attends to causes and consequences of war but only fitfully welcomes study of its conduct, because few grasp how much the dynamics of combat shape politics. Bernard Brodie called for development of strategic studies on the model of the discipline of economics, because neither the military nor academia treated the subject rigorously. His call was answered in the early cold war, with mixed results. Theories about nuclear deterrence burgeoned while empirical studies of war lagged. The late-cold war impasse in nuclear strategy, rooted in nato doctrine, shifted attention to conventional military operations and empirically grounded theory. Since the cold war, research on general theoretical questions about war and peace has been prospering, but education in military matters has been eroding. Interdisciplinary strategic studies integrate political and military elements of international conflict, but there is no recognized discipline of military science; military analysis is smuggled into political science and history departments, where it is resisted by calls to conceptualize security broadly or focus on purely theoretical work. If serious military studies are squeezed out of universities, there will be no qualified civilian analysts to provide independent expertise in policy and budget debates, and decisions on war and peace will be made irresponsibly by uninformed civilians or by the professional military alone.

@article{Betts:1997, abstract = {Political science attends to causes and consequences of war but only fitfully welcomes study of its conduct, because few grasp how much the dynamics of combat shape politics. Bernard Brodie called for development of strategic studies on the model of the discipline of economics, because neither the military nor academia treated the subject rigorously. His call was answered in the early cold war, with mixed results. Theories about nuclear deterrence burgeoned while empirical studies of war lagged. The late-cold war impasse in nuclear strategy, rooted in nato doctrine, shifted attention to conventional military operations and empirically grounded theory. Since the cold war, research on general theoretical questions about war and peace has been prospering, but education in military matters has been eroding. Interdisciplinary strategic studies integrate political and military elements of international conflict, but there is no recognized discipline of military science; military analysis is smuggled into political science and history departments, where it is resisted by calls to conceptualize security broadly or focus on purely theoretical work. If serious military studies are squeezed out of universities, there will be no qualified civilian analysts to provide independent expertise in policy and budget debates, and decisions on war and peace will be made irresponsibly by uninformed civilians or by the professional military alone.}, added-at = {2010-03-02T17:25:53.000+0100}, author = {Betts, Richard K.}, bdsk-file-1 = {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}, bdsk-file-2 = {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}, bdsk-url-1 = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054025}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2f3ffe657ee2fe2c6274bcb8a63dd04d8/jrennstich}, date-modified = {2010-02-28 21:03:30 -0500}, interhash = {33877f7584370eb462253a4c93aec130}, intrahash = {f3ffe657ee2fe2c6274bcb8a63dd04d8}, journal = {World Politics}, keywords = {geopolitics methodology security strategic theory}, month = Oct, number = 1, pages = {7--33}, read = {Yes}, timestamp = {2010-03-02T17:27:28.000+0100}, title = {Should Strategic Studies Survive?}, volume = 50, year = 1997 }