%0 Journal Article %1 scheufele_agenda-setting_2000 %A Scheufele, Dietram A. %D 2000 %J Mass Communication & Society %K agenda-setting framing intellectual internalist literature-review political-communication priming %N 2-3 %R 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 %T Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication %V 3 %X Agenda-setting, priming, and framing research generally has been examined under the broad category of cognitive media effects. As a result, studies often either examine all 3 approaches in a single study or employ very similar research designs, paying little attention to conceptual differences or differences in the levels of analysis under which each approach is operating. In this article, I revisit agenda-setting, priming, and framing as distinctively different approaches to effects of political communication. Specifically, I argue against more recent attempts to subsume all 3 approaches under the broad concept of agenda-setting and for a more careful explication of the concepts and of their theoretical premises and roots in social psychology and political psychology. Consequently, it calls for a reformulation of relevant research questions and a systematic categorization of research on agenda-setting, priming, and framing. An analytic model is developed that should serve as a guideline for future research in these areas.

@article{scheufele_agenda-setting_2000, abstract = {Agenda-setting, priming, and framing research generally has been examined under the broad category of cognitive media effects. As a result, studies often either examine all 3 approaches in a single study or employ very similar research designs, paying little attention to conceptual differences or differences in the levels of analysis under which each approach is operating. In this article, I revisit agenda-setting, priming, and framing as distinctively different approaches to effects of political communication. Specifically, I argue against more recent attempts to subsume all 3 approaches under the broad concept of agenda-setting and for a more careful explication of the concepts and of their theoretical premises and roots in social psychology and political psychology. Consequently, it calls for a reformulation of relevant research questions and a systematic categorization of research on agenda-setting, priming, and framing. An analytic model is developed that should serve as a guideline for future research in these areas.}, added-at = {2019-08-29T01:56:31.000+0200}, author = {Scheufele, Dietram A.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2b2dc7ffe9bb1b018fa52bdd3dbac1c9d/jpooley}, doi = {10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07}, interhash = {3cb12fb8c96e05d7581c775cb030833c}, intrahash = {b2dc7ffe9bb1b018fa52bdd3dbac1c9d}, journal = {Mass Communication \& Society}, keywords = {agenda-setting framing intellectual internalist literature-review political-communication priming}, number = {2-3}, timestamp = {2019-08-29T01:56:31.000+0200}, title = {Agenda-{{Setting}}, {{Priming}}, and {{Framing Revisited}}: {{Another Look}} at {{Cognitive Effects}} of {{Political Communication}}}, volume = 3, year = 2000 }