%0 Journal Article %1 Coeckelbergh2023 %A Coeckelbergh, Mark %D 2023 %J AI and Ethics %K ai democracy epistemic epistemology literacy %N 4 %P 1341-1350 %R 10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4 %T Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence %U https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4 %V 3 %X Democratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been paid to how they are supposed to acquire that knowledge in contexts shaped by artificial intelligence and related digital technologies. While this topic can also be approached from an empirical angle, this paper contributes to supporting concerns about AI and democracy by looking at the issue through the lens of political epistemology, in particular using the concept of epistemic agency. It argues that artificial intelligence (AI) endangers democracy since it risks to diminish the epistemic agency of citizens and thereby undermine the relevant kind of political agency in democracy. It shows that next to fake news and manipulation by means of AI analysis of big data, epistemic bubbles and the defaulting of statistical knowledge endanger the epistemic agency of citizens when they form and wish to revise their political beliefs. AI risks to undermine trust in one's own epistemic capacities and hinder the exercise of those capacities. If we want to protect the knowledge basis of our democracies, we must address these problems in education and technology policy.

@article{Coeckelbergh2023, abstract = {Democratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been paid to how they are supposed to acquire that knowledge in contexts shaped by artificial intelligence and related digital technologies. While this topic can also be approached from an empirical angle, this paper contributes to supporting concerns about AI and democracy by looking at the issue through the lens of political epistemology, in particular using the concept of epistemic agency. It argues that artificial intelligence (AI) endangers democracy since it risks to diminish the epistemic agency of citizens and thereby undermine the relevant kind of political agency in democracy. It shows that next to fake news and manipulation by means of AI analysis of big data, epistemic bubbles and the defaulting of statistical knowledge endanger the epistemic agency of citizens when they form and wish to revise their political beliefs. AI risks to undermine trust in one's own epistemic capacities and hinder the exercise of those capacities. If we want to protect the knowledge basis of our democracies, we must address these problems in education and technology policy.}, added-at = {2024-06-09T11:12:54.000+0200}, author = {Coeckelbergh, Mark}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2cb042672c5909df756b7241543f231c2/yish}, day = 01, description = {Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence | AI and Ethics}, doi = {10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4}, interhash = {52399c90ebaa5a29e2d0f529c8b16d00}, intrahash = {cb042672c5909df756b7241543f231c2}, issn = {2730-5961}, journal = {AI and Ethics}, keywords = {ai democracy epistemic epistemology literacy}, month = nov, number = 4, pages = {1341-1350}, timestamp = {2024-06-09T11:12:54.000+0200}, title = {Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4}, volume = 3, year = 2023 }