Artikel,

SIMULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS DISPERSION IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT

, und .
IJIRIS:: International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security, Volume VI (Issue II): 29-39 (Februar 2019)1. Katiyar, A., Singh, S. K. & Haritash, A. K. Effect of Odd Even Scheme To Combat Air Pollution in Nct of Delhi. Int. J. Adv. Res 5, 2320–5407 (2017). 2. Shekhar Singh, S. & SK, S. Environmental Concerns in National Capital Territory of Delhi, India. J. Climatol. Weather Forecast. 03, 3–7 (2015). 3. Tiwary, A. & Colls, J. Air Pollution: Measurement, modelling and mitigation. Atmospheric Environment (2010). doi:doi:10.4324/9780203476024.fmatt 4. Paliatsos, A. G., Kaldellis, J. K., Koronakis, P. S. & Garofalakis, J. E. Fifteen year air quality trends associated with the vehicle traffic in Athens, Greece. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 11, 1119–1126 (2002). 5. LI, X., LIU, C., LEUNG, D. & LAM, K. Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons. Atmos. Environ. 40, 5640–5658 (2006). 6. Assael, M. J., Delaki, M. & Kakosimos, K. E. Applying the OSPM model to the calculation of PM10concentration levels in the historical centre of the city of Thessaloniki. Atmos. Environ. 42, 65–77 (2008). 7. Taseiko, O. V., Mikhailuta, S. V., Pitt, A., Lezhenin, A. A. & Zakharov, Y. V. Air pollution dispersion within urban street canyons. Atmos. Environ. 43, 245–252 (2009). 8. Aenab, A. M., Needs, C., Foundation, S. & Singh, S. K. Air Quality Assessment : A Statistical Approach to Stationary Air Monitoring Stations Air Quality Assessment : A Statistical Approach to Stationary Air Monitoring Stations. (2015). 9. Mapoma, H. W. T., Tenthani, C., Tsakama, M. & Kosamu, I. B. M. Air quality assessment of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide levels in Blantyre, Malawi: A statistical approach to a stationary environmental monitoring station. African J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 8, 330–343 (2014). 10. Meroney, R. N., Pavageau, M., Rafailidis, S. & Schatzmann, M. Study of line source characteristics for 2-D physical modelling of pollutant dispersion in street canyons. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 62, 37–56 (1996). 11. Rafailidis, S. Influence of Building Areal Density and Roof Shape on the Wind Characteristics Above a Town. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 85, 255–271 (1997). 12. Uehara, K., Murakami, S., Oikawa, S. & Wakamatsu, S. Wind tunnel experiments on how thermal stratification affects flow in and above urban street canyons. Atmos. Environ. (2000). doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00410-0 13. Yassin, M. F., Kellnerová, R. & Jaňour, Z. Impact of street intersections on air quality in an urban environment. Atmos. Environ. 42, 4948–4963 (2008). 14. Chan, T. L., Dong, G., Leung, C. W., Cheung, C. S. & Hung, W. T. Validation of a two-dimensional pollutant dispersion model in an isolated street canyon. Atmos. Environ. 36, 861–872 (2002). 15. Kanakiya, R. S., Singh, S. K. & Mehta, P. M. Urban Canyon Modelling : A Need for the Design of Future Indian Cities. 4, 86–95 (2015). 16. Assimakopoulos, V. D., ApSimon, H. M. & Moussiopoulos, N. A numerical study of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in different two-dimensional street canyon configurations. Atmos. Environ. 37, 4037–4049 (2003). 17. Hassan, A. A. & Crowther, J. M. Modelling of fluid flow and pollutant dispersion in a street canyon. in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (1998). doi:10.1023/A:1005928630000 18. Huang, H., Akutsu, Y., Arai, M. & Tamura, M. A two-dimensional air quality model in an urban street canyon: Evaluation and sensitivity analysis. Atmos. Environ. 34, 689–698 (2000). 19. Di Sabatino, S., Buccolieri, R., Pulvirenti, B. & Britter, R. Simulations of pollutant dispersion within idealised urban-type geometries with CFD and integral models. Atmos. Environ. 41, 8316–8329 (2007). 20. Sini, J. F., Anquetin, S. & Mestayer, P. G. Pollutant dispersion and thermal effects in urban street canyons. Atmos. Environ. 30, 2659–2677 (1996). 21. Ahmadi, G. & Li, A. Computer simulation of particle transport and deposition near a small isolated building. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 84, 23–46 (2000). 22. Janour, Z., Jurcakova, K., Brych, K., Dittrt, F. & Dittrich, F. Potential risks at an industrial site: A wind tunnel study. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 88, 185–190 (2010). 23. Kim, J. J. & Baik, J. J. A numerical study of the effects of ambient wind direction on flow and dispersion in urban street canyons using the RNG k-ε turbulence model. Atmos. Environ. 38, 3039–3048 (2004). 24. Gousseau, P., Blocken, B., Stathopoulos, T. & van Heijst, G. J. F. CFD simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: A case study by LES and RANS for a building group in downtown Montreal. Atmos. Environ. (2011). doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.065 25. Li, X. X., Liu, C. H. & Leung, D. Y. C. Large-eddy simulation of flow and pollutant dispersion in high-aspect-ratio urban street canyons with wall model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. (2008). doi:10.1007/s10546-008-9313-y 26. Xie, Z. T. & Castro, I. P. Large-eddy simulation for flow and dispersion in urban streets. Atmos. Environ. (2009). doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.016 27. Barmpas, F., Bouris, D. & Moussiopoulos, N. 3D Numerical Simulation of the Transient Thermal Behavior of a Simplified Building Envelope Under External Flow. J. Sol. Energy Eng. (2009). doi:10.1115/1.3139137 28. Jiang, Y. & Chen, Q. Effect of fluctuating wind direction on cross natural ventilation in buildings from large eddy simulation. Build. Environ. (2002). doi:10.1016/S0360-1323(01)00036-1 29. Tzempelikos, A., Athienitis, A. K. & Karava, P. Simulation of facade and envelope design options for a new institutional building. Sol. Energy (2007). doi:10.1016/j.solener.2007.02.006 30. Jiang, Y., Alexander, D., Jenkins, H., Arthur, R. & Chen, Q. Natural ventilation in buildings: Measurement in a wind tunnel and numerical simulation with large-eddy simulation. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. (2003). doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00380-X.
DOI: doi://10.26562/IJIRIS.2019.FBIS10080

Zusammenfassung

Interest in air pollution investigation of urban environment due to existence of industrial and commercial activities along with vehicular emission and existence of buildings and streets which setup natural barrier for pollutant dispersion in the urban environment has increased. The air pollution modelling is a multidisciplinary subject when the entire cities are taken under consideration where urban planning and geometries are complex which needs a large software packages to be developed like Operational Street Pollution Model (OSPM), California Line Source model (CALINE series) etc. On overviewing various works it can be summarized that the air pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons and all linked phenomenon such as wind flow, pollutant concentrations, temperature distribution etc. generally depend on wind speed and direction, building heights and density, road width, source and intensity of air pollution, meteorological variables like temperature, humidity etc. A unique and surprising case is observed every time on numerous combinations of these factors. The main aim of this study is to simulate the atmospheric pollutant dispersion for given pollutant like carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide and given atmospheric conditions like wind speed and direction. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation for analysing the atmospheric pollutant dispersion is done after natural airflow analysis. Volume rendering is done for variables such as phase 2 volume fraction and velocity with resolution as 250 pixels per inch and transparency as 20%. It can be observed that all the three pollutant namely nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and carbon monoxide the phase 2 volume fraction changes from 0 to 1. The wind velocity changes from 3.395×10-13 m/s to 1.692×102 m/s. The dispersion of pollutants follow the sequence Sulphur dioxide>Carbon monoxide>Nitrogen dioxide.

Tags

Nutzer

  • @ijiris

Kommentare und Rezensionen