Abstract
This article addresses the emergence of networks of practice and the
role of knowledge sharing via knowledge portals. Its focus is on
factors that stimulate the successful emergence of networks of practice.
Literature on knowledge management and communities of practice suggest
the pre-existence of shared knowledge or a shared belief system as
a condition sine qua non for the networks of practice to emerge.
We challenge this assumption and argue and demonstrate that common
knowledge and belief systems are rather a result of knowledge sharing
rather than a pre-condition. The central question is how a knowledge
portal facilitates the diffusion of knowledge among rather loosely
coupled and often disconnected innovation projects. Research is carried
out in the agricultural industry in The Netherlands. In this industry
there is a need to change from a product-oriented to a problem-oriented
innovation structure. The set up of a platform and knowledge portal
around agro-logistics – crossing different product-oriented production
clusters – was therefore a logical result. It gave the opportunity
to analyze what the impact of a knowledge portal is in a situation
where people and projects come from different organizations and do
not know each other. Do they start to share knowledge and what are
the conditions? With regard to the case study of the knowledge portal
in the agricultural industry we conclude that a knowledge portal
will have an impact on how projects are sharing knowledge and on
the emergence of a network of practice. The results show that pre-conditions
for the emergence of a network of practice are a sense of urgency
and fragmented awareness. These results also indicate the important
role of a knowledge broker. The developed knowledge portal seems
to lead to overcoming structural holes and a closer cognitive distance
among the projects. However, we did not find a direct effect of the
knowledge portal on sharing tacit knowledge. In the initial phase
of a network of practice the knowledge exchange seems to focus on
general, non-project specific and explicit knowledge. There was also
no direct effect of the knowledge portal on the reciprocity of knowledge
exchange among the projects. However, knowledge was shared between
the project level and the platform and public level. Conclusions
and directions for future research are formulated.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).