Abstract
The NP-completeness theory provides a method for telling whether a decision/optimization problem is ëasy\" (i.e., it belongs to the P class) or \"hard\" (i.e., it belongs to the NP-complete class). Many famous problems have been proven to belong to the NP-complete class such as the Traveling Salesman problem, the Bin Packing problem, the Knapsack problem, etc. This paper deals with a usually overlooked property of NP-complete problems: the bi-directionality of the transformation between pairs of NP-complete problems. This property states that for any two NP-complete problems A and B, it must be possible to transform A to B in polynomial time and vice versa. This article shows that this property does not seem to hold for two NP-complete problems: Partition and Bin Packing, which contradicts the theory and, therefore, constitutes the paradox, subject of this paper.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).