%0 Journal Article %1 SERRANORIPOLL2020347 %A Serrano-Ripoll, Maria J. %A Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. %A Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio %A Fraile-Navarro, David %A Fiol deRoque, Maria A. %A Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe %A Castro, Adoración %A Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel %A Zamanillo Campos, Rocío %A Gonçalves-Bradley, Daniela C. %D 2020 %J Journal of Affective Disorders %K grapp-caib myown %P 347-357 %R https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.034 %T Impact of viral epidemic outbreaks on mental health of healthcare workers: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis %U https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032720326392 %V 277 %X Background: This study aimed at examining the impact of providing healthcare during health emergencies caused by viral epidemic outbreaks on healthcare workers' (HCWs) mental health; to identify factors associated with worse impact, and; to assess the available evidence base regarding interventions to reduce such impact. Method: Rapid systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO (inception to August 2020). We pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of specific mental health problems, and used GRADE to ascertain the certainty of evidence. Results: We included 117 studies. The pooled prevalence was higher for acute stress disorder (40% (95%CI 39 to 41%)), followed by anxiety (30%, (30 to 31%)), burnout (28% (26 to 31%)), depression (24% (24 to 25%)), and post-traumatic stress disorder (13% (13 to 14%)). We identified factors associated with the likelihood of developing those problems, including sociodemographic (younger age and female gender), social (lack of social support, stigmatization), and occupational (working in a high-risk environment, specific occupational roles, and lower levels of specialised training and job experience) factors. Four studies reported interventions for frontline HCW: two educational interventions increased confidence in pandemic self-efficacy and in interpersonal problems solving (very low certainty), whereas one multifaceted intervention improved anxiety, depression, and sleep quality (very low certainty). Limitations: We only searched three databases, and the initial screening was undertaken by a single reviewer. Conclusion: Given the very limited evidence regarding the impact of interventions to tackle mental health problems in HCWs, the risk factors identified represent important targets for future interventions.

@article{SERRANORIPOLL2020347, abstract = {Background: This study aimed at examining the impact of providing healthcare during health emergencies caused by viral epidemic outbreaks on healthcare workers' (HCWs) mental health; to identify factors associated with worse impact, and; to assess the available evidence base regarding interventions to reduce such impact. Method: Rapid systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO (inception to August 2020). We pooled data using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of specific mental health problems, and used GRADE to ascertain the certainty of evidence. Results: We included 117 studies. The pooled prevalence was higher for acute stress disorder (40% (95%CI 39 to 41%)), followed by anxiety (30%, (30 to 31%)), burnout (28% (26 to 31%)), depression (24% (24 to 25%)), and post-traumatic stress disorder (13% (13 to 14%)). We identified factors associated with the likelihood of developing those problems, including sociodemographic (younger age and female gender), social (lack of social support, stigmatization), and occupational (working in a high-risk environment, specific occupational roles, and lower levels of specialised training and job experience) factors. Four studies reported interventions for frontline HCW: two educational interventions increased confidence in pandemic self-efficacy and in interpersonal problems solving (very low certainty), whereas one multifaceted intervention improved anxiety, depression, and sleep quality (very low certainty). Limitations: We only searched three databases, and the initial screening was undertaken by a single reviewer. Conclusion: Given the very limited evidence regarding the impact of interventions to tackle mental health problems in HCWs, the risk factors identified represent important targets for future interventions.}, added-at = {2022-05-14T07:10:08.000+0200}, author = {Serrano-Ripoll, Maria J. and Meneses-Echavez, Jose F. and Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio and Fraile-Navarro, David and Fiol deRoque, Maria A. and Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe and Castro, Adoración and Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel and {Zamanillo Campos}, Rocío and Gonçalves-Bradley, Daniela C.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/29b3b5e538ef517e123d77761b406fc82/nachoricci}, description = {Impact of viral epidemic outbreaks on mental health of healthcare workers: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.034}, interhash = {7a90031f92786b495da62a70dd4e2f5a}, intrahash = {9b3b5e538ef517e123d77761b406fc82}, issn = {0165-0327}, journal = {Journal of Affective Disorders}, keywords = {grapp-caib myown}, pages = {347-357}, timestamp = {2022-05-14T07:10:08.000+0200}, title = {Impact of viral epidemic outbreaks on mental health of healthcare workers: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032720326392}, volume = 277, year = 2020 }