%0 Report %1 benjamins02 %A Benjamins, Richard R. %A Contreras, Jesús %A Corcho, Oscar %A Pérez, Asunción G. %C Madrid %D 2002 %I Technical University of Madrid %K web semantic %T Six Challenges for the Semantic Web %U http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~nernst/papers/SemanticWeb-whitepaper-137.pdf

@techreport{benjamins02, added-at = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, address = {Madrid}, author = {Benjamins, Richard R. and Contreras, Jesús and Corcho, Oscar and Pérez, Asunción G.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2dc103837c14e4d769135b2241346a46c/neilernst}, citeulike-article-id = {111751}, comment = {good point on how visualization is required for large application requirements: 1- make information SW accessible (difficult and costly) 2 - create common, widely-used ontologies 3 - make storage of data scalable 4 - multilingual 5 - new visualization techniques 6 - standardize web language - key point of SW - the knowledge about data would be available in the data, rather than scraped from it and added by programming (thus decreasing programming effort (viz. shrimpbib) - apply SW to web services pt 3 - semantic indexes - this addresses the storage angle - relational model for example is much cleaner I think. Current approach on web is very flat and non-organized (organized by originator and indexed by text words and links) - pt 5 very focused on 3D for some reason, don't think they understand the problem domain very well (or the concepts of infovis). - pt 5 "users will be increasingly demanding easy recognition of the relevance of content for their purposes."}, description = {sdasda}, interhash = {9c07197f7e6e2fe93833e98fe4fa8687}, intrahash = {dc103837c14e4d769135b2241346a46c}, keywords = {web semantic}, pdf = {SemanticWeb-whitepaper-137.pdf}, priority = {0}, publisher = {Technical University of Madrid}, timestamp = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, title = {Six {C}hallenges for the {S}emantic {W}eb}, url = {http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~nernst/papers/SemanticWeb-whitepaper-137.pdf}, year = 2002 }