%0 Conference Paper %1 gibson97 %A Gibson, Paul J. %B Feature Interactions in Telecommunications Networks IV %C Montreal, Canada %D 1997 %E Dini, Petre %E Boutaba, Raouf %E Logrippo, Luigi %I IOS Press %K requirements feature comprehension %P 46--60 %T Feature Requirements Models: Understanding Interactions

@inproceedings{gibson97, added-at = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, address = {Montreal, Canada}, author = {Gibson, Paul J.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/22db70eb3fb6b60652bbc63012d5073d9/neilernst}, booktitle = {Feature Interactions in Telecommunications Networks IV}, citeulike-article-id = {384141}, comment = {- the notion of semantically enriching models w/ temporal operators seems good - "features are observable behaviour" - "a feature interaction occurs in a system whose complete behaviour does not satisfy the separate specification of all its features" (this sounds like a requirements failure) - no notion of emergent interactions, really. Just A should do this, B assumes this, so there's a problem. - how does XP deal with feature interaction -refactor prob. - operators include must/may complete (fairness) and always/eventually (temporal) - what about unexpected events? Normative models? - feature interaction is equiv to inconsistent requirements, only from a feature perspective, not an Actor perspective}, description = {sdasda}, editor = {Dini, Petre and Boutaba, Raouf and Logrippo, Luigi}, interhash = {cf89c403f00059ccb2c07ef0a5d0b3b6}, intrahash = {2db70eb3fb6b60652bbc63012d5073d9}, keywords = {requirements feature comprehension}, month = {June}, pages = {46--60}, priority = {0}, publisher = {IOS Press}, timestamp = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, title = {Feature Requirements Models: Understanding Interactions}, year = 1997 }