%0 Journal Article %1 chen2015exploring %A Chen, Kuang-hua %A Tang, Muh-chyun %A Wang, Chun-mei %A Hsiang, Jieh %D 2015 %I Springer Netherlands %J Scientometrics %K altmetrics geisteswissenschaften sozialwissenschaften %N 1 %P 97-112 %R 10.1007/s11192-014-1420-6 %T Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan %U http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1420-6 %V 102 %X Research output and impact metrics derived from commercial citation databases such as Web of Science and Scopus have become the de facto indicators of scholarly performance across different disciplines and regions. However, it has been pointed out that the existing metrics are largely inadequate to reflect scholars’ overall peer-mediated performance, especially in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) where publication channels are more diverse. In this paper alternative metrics exploring a variety of formal and informal communication channels were proposed, with the aim of better reflecting SSH scholarship. Data for a group of SSH scholars in Taiwan on these metrics were collected. Principal component analysis revealed four underlying dimensions represented by the 18 metrics. Multiple-regression analyses were then performed to examine how well each of these dimensions predicted the academic standing of the scholars, measured by the number of public grants awarded and prestigious research awards received. Differences in the significance of the predictors were found between the social sciences and humanities. The results suggest the need to consider disciplinary differences when evaluating scholarly performance.

@article{chen2015exploring, abstract = {Research output and impact metrics derived from commercial citation databases such as Web of Science and Scopus have become the de facto indicators of scholarly performance across different disciplines and regions. However, it has been pointed out that the existing metrics are largely inadequate to reflect scholars’ overall peer-mediated performance, especially in the social sciences and humanities (SSH) where publication channels are more diverse. In this paper alternative metrics exploring a variety of formal and informal communication channels were proposed, with the aim of better reflecting SSH scholarship. Data for a group of SSH scholars in Taiwan on these metrics were collected. Principal component analysis revealed four underlying dimensions represented by the 18 metrics. Multiple-regression analyses were then performed to examine how well each of these dimensions predicted the academic standing of the scholars, measured by the number of public grants awarded and prestigious research awards received. Differences in the significance of the predictors were found between the social sciences and humanities. The results suggest the need to consider disciplinary differences when evaluating scholarly performance.}, added-at = {2015-02-11T10:50:47.000+0100}, author = {Chen, Kuang-hua and Tang, Muh-chyun and Wang, Chun-mei and Hsiang, Jieh}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2bedca419fae6aea5258be3fb8d2327db/wdees}, description = {Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan - Springer}, doi = {10.1007/s11192-014-1420-6}, interhash = {d2b888e4cb0eae694c380cf86e271fef}, intrahash = {bedca419fae6aea5258be3fb8d2327db}, issn = {0138-9130}, journal = {Scientometrics}, keywords = {altmetrics geisteswissenschaften sozialwissenschaften}, language = {English}, number = 1, pages = {97-112}, publisher = {Springer Netherlands}, timestamp = {2015-02-11T10:50:47.000+0100}, title = {Exploring alternative metrics of scholarly performance in the social sciences and humanities in Taiwan}, url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1420-6}, volume = 102, year = 2015 }