Spatial relations indicate the location of an object by specifying its direction with respect to a reference object whose location is known. It has been largely assumed that specific features of these objects are generally ignored in descriptions of spatial location. Within such a view, spatial relations can be described in terms of geometric or topological features that are not dependent on object details such as function. We demonstrate in two experiments that a geometric feature (center of mass) is not sufficient. Using two different tasks, we show that the function of the reference object and its relationship with the other object signifi…(more)
Please log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).
Cite this publication
More citation styles
- please select -
%0 Journal Article
%1 carlsonradvansky1999
%A Carlson-Radvansky, Laura A.
%A Covey, Eric S.
%A Lattanzi, Kathleen M.
%D 1999
%I Cambridge University Press
%J Psychological Science
%K cognitivescience article spatialcognition empiricalstudy
%N 6
%P 516--521
%T "What" Effects on "Where": Functional Influences on Spatial Relations
%V 10
%X Spatial relations indicate the location of an object by specifying its direction with respect to a reference object whose location is known. It has been largely assumed that specific features of these objects are generally ignored in descriptions of spatial location. Within such a view, spatial relations can be described in terms of geometric or topological features that are not dependent on object details such as function. We demonstrate in two experiments that a geometric feature (center of mass) is not sufficient. Using two different tasks, we show that the function of the reference object and its relationship with the other object significantly influence the way in which vertical spatial relations (äbove" and "below") are applied to spatial configurations.
@article{carlsonradvansky1999,
abstract = {Spatial relations indicate the location of an object by specifying its direction with respect to a reference object whose location is known. It has been largely assumed that specific features of these objects are generally ignored in descriptions of spatial location. Within such a view, spatial relations can be described in terms of geometric or topological features that are not dependent on object details such as function. We demonstrate in two experiments that a geometric feature (center of mass) is not sufficient. Using two different tasks, we show that the function of the reference object and its relationship with the other object significantly influence the way in which vertical spatial relations ("above" and "below") are applied to spatial configurations.
},
added-at = {2006-05-17T09:37:13.000+0200},
author = {Carlson-Radvansky, Laura A. and Covey, Eric S. and Lattanzi, Kathleen M.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c661bf3dd76321778bd9a94a4b8176d9/tmalsburg},
interhash = {ddc9414b4ee547a65887d6c68edefbad},
intrahash = {c661bf3dd76321778bd9a94a4b8176d9},
journal = {Psychological Science},
keywords = {cognitivescience article spatialcognition empiricalstudy},
number = 6,
pages = {516--521},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
timestamp = {2006-05-17T09:37:13.000+0200},
title = {"What" Effects on "Where": Functional Influences on Spatial Relations},
volume = 10,
year = 1999
}