%0 Report %1 chute02 %A Chute, C. %D 2002 %I Special Report to NCI %K logic ontology description knowledge acquisition %T Authoring Environments for Biomedical Terminology Development: Components, Requirements, Candidates, Options, and Futures

@techreport{chute02, added-at = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, author = {Chute, C.}, biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/20c215801db5e9f01eb0f0f2a6d9138e2/neilernst}, citeulike-article-id = {111788}, comment = {must be in an email attachment --- Discusses DL vs protege, esp differences "The inference capabilities of frame-based systems, however, are relatively limited. They consist primarily of the transitivity of the is-a relationship, the constraints that facets impose on slots, and the inheritance of slots and slot values to subclasses and instances. The is-a relationships, slots, and slot values constrain the meaning of concepts defined as classes in a frame-based system, but they do not define them (i.e., they give only the necessary, but not the sufficient conditions for the concepts). Thus, given a new concept that has a set of properties, it is impossible to classify the new concept in Protégé-2000?s taxonomic hierarchy automatically." Different use-cases in Protege, useful for user modelling? Each one will be accessed through a different ?tab? in a single Protégé-2000 process. The three views are (1) the domain-expert authoring view, (2) the DL-authoring view, and (3) the application view.}, description = {sdasda}, interhash = {df4c369fbe1d029400061fd4fb7bf34c}, intrahash = {0c215801db5e9f01eb0f0f2a6d9138e2}, keywords = {logic ontology description knowledge acquisition}, priority = {0}, publisher = {Special Report to NCI}, timestamp = {2006-03-24T16:34:33.000+0100}, title = {Authoring {E}nvironments for {B}iomedical {T}erminology {D}evelopment: {C}omponents, {R}equirements, {C}andidates, {O}ptions, and {F}utures}, year = 2002 }