Abstract
As classical reasoning from inconsistent ontologies can't give meaningful
answers to queries, it is necessary to either revise the ontology,
discarding some axioms in order to restore consistency, or make use
of a non-standard notion of logical entailment that allows to give
meaningful answers from inconsistent premises.
We propose a complete procedure to reason with inconsistent ontologies
and show how ontology revision can be obtained from inconsistency
reasoning.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).