Abstract
Purpose
Recent theorizing in intraindividual well-being research suggests (1) considering whether day-level effects of job demands on wellbeing
have sustainable practically relevant impact on the long run (Ilies, Aw, & Pluut, 2015) and (2) approaching work-related
phenomena from an event perspective that is more in line with what actually happens (Morgeson, Mitchell, & Liu, 2015). We answer
both calls in examining the short-term and long-term effects negative events (e.g., conflicts) and positive events (e.g., goal
attainment) on well-being. We consider facets of rumination at the weekend as our focal outcomes, namely psychological
detachment, affective rumination, and problem-solving pondering.
Design/Methodology
We conducted a week-level diary study across 15 consecutive weeks yielding 724 matched weekly assessments on Fridays and
Mondays from an organizationally diverse sample of 118 employees.
Results
Our multilevel analyses yield significant short-term links between negative events and all facets of rumination. Sustainable effects are
confined to affective rumination. Although short-term effects are less accentuated for positive events they compensate for negative
events on the short run as well as on the long run and hence facilitate switching off.
Limitations
We cannot rule out retrospective biases in judgments across several days.
Research/Practical Implications
An accumulation of positive events has the potential to buffer adverse effects of negative events on the long run although single
events may seem to have negligible impact.
Originality/Value
We are among the first to empircally address the topical issues raised above. Our analyses are based on a rich longitudinal design and
we apply strong methodology.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).