Article,

Positive reasons for publishing negative findings.

.
The American journal of gastroenterology, 103 (9): 2181-3 (September 2008)4643<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 0421030; 0 (Immunosuppressive Agents); 159351-69-6 (everolimus); 53123-88-9 (Sirolimus); CON: Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Sep;103(9):2284-92. PMID: 18671816; 2008/07/30 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02028.x

Abstract

Scientific and medical authors tend to be biased toward submitting "statistically significant" findings for publication. Journals show a similar bias in publishing such "positive" studies. The large number of publications in medical research means that, in a field obsessed with controlling Type I error rates, we have journals with an abundance of Type I errors. Failing to publish studies that do not show a treatment or exposure effect creates a literature conspicuously absent of trials necessary for unbiased meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Furthermore, by shelving or rejecting studies with nonstatistically significant outcomes, authors and editors censor the most important contributors to medical research: our consenting volunteers.

Tags

Users

  • @jepcastel

Comments and Reviews