A high court judge in England has ordered that doctors can force a woman without the capacity to decide for herself to have lifesaving treatment for aplastic anaemia. Mrs Justice Hogg made the ruling in the Court of Protection after an unnamed NHS trust applied to the court with the backing of the Official Solicitor, who looks after the interests of those lacking capacity. The judge said the 30 year old woman, named only as SB, who is detained under the Mental Health Act, has a serious psychiatric disorder and lacks the capacity to decide for herself whether or not to have the potentially lifesaving treatment.
A patient in Broadmoor Hospital who has spent more than two decades alongside some of Britain's most dangerous criminals has won the right to have a review into his detention heard in public, The Independent has learned. The decision, which is thought to be a legal first, has major implications for the way Mental Health Tribunals function and will open the doors to one of the country's most secretive arbitration systems. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has spent 23 years detained under the Mental Health Act, mostly at Broadmoor Hospital, the high-security facility in Berkshire that houses notorious offenders such as the serial killers Peter Sutcliffe and Robert Napper. He was committed in September 1986 after being convicted on two counts of attempted wounding. Doctors had classified the 52-year-old as having a mental illness and psychopathic disorder, but in September 2008 they changed the diagnosis to just a psychopathic disorder.
In the Netherlands, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are considered acceptable medical practices in specific circumstances. The majority of cases of euthanasia and PAS involve patients suffering from cancer. However, in 1994 the Dutch Supreme Court in the so-called Chabot-case ruled that “the seriousness of the suffering of the patient does not depend on the cause of the suffering”, thereby rejecting a distinction between physical (or somatic) and mental suffering. This opened the way for further debate about the acceptability of PAS in cases of serious and refractory mental illness. An important objection against offering PAS to mentally ill patients is that this might reinforce loss of hope, and demoralization. Based on an analysis of a reported case, this argument is evaluated. It is argued that offering PAS to a patient with a mental illness who suffers unbearably, enduringly and without prospect of relief does not necessarily imply taking away hope and can be eth...
No country has a blanket policy of mandatory psychiatric review but the specialty contributes in circumstances of exclusive mental disorder or when there is doubt regarding capacity and sound judgement. The absence of a mandatory role for psychiatrists means that reversible psychopathology may be missed. As a result, the patient's decision to end his/her life may be more informed by treatable mental disorder than by his/her lifelong preferences.
Judge approves forced Caesarean for mentally-ill woman Doctors have been granted permission to perform an urgent Caesarean section on a mentally-ill woman with diabetes. High Court judge Mr Justice Hayden gave specialists at the Royal Free London NHS Trust approval after a five-hour hearing at the Court of Protection. He said the decision was "draconian" but necessary because the mother's life may be in danger. The woman, 32, who is 32 weeks pregnant, was deemed unable to make the decision over how to give birth. The ruling, late on Friday, came after doctors applied for permission to carry out the delivery in order that the patient's "unstable mental state" could be treated. A specialist from the trust told the Court of Protection in London, which specialises in issues relating to the sick and vulnerable, that their priority was "keeping this woman alive".
An initiative by the American Psychiatric Association Foundation encouraging employers to take actions that will support good mental health in the workplace.
S. Kisely, and E. Kendall. Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 19 (4):
364-7(August 2011)6504<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 9613603; 2011/08/24 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Critical appraisal; Investigació qualitativa.
P. Nieminen, J. Carpenter, G. Rucker, and M. Schumacher. BMC medical research methodology, (January 2006)4347<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; PUBM: Electronic; DEP: 20060901; JID: 100968545; PMC1570136; 2006/04/17 received; 2006/09/01 accepted; 2006/09/01 aheadofprint; epublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
N. Bass, A. Vos, and S. Woodgate. Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 36 (9):
760-4(September 2007)5034<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 7503289; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Recursos/Organització; Formació.
P. Yanos, and D. Ziedonis. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 57 (2):
249-53(February 2006)4108<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Recursos/Organització; Recerca clínica.