tag :: RCT ResearchDesign:standards

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

No matching posts.

⟨⟨
⟨
⟩
⟩⟩

publications (hide)24
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...

1Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality.
S. Donegan, P. Williamson, C. Gamble, and C. Tudur-Smith. PloS one, 5 (11): e11054 (January 2010)Network meta-analysis.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Humans
Matched-PairAnalysis
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statistics
ReproducibilityofResults
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
ResearchDesign:statistics&numericaldata
RCT
HumansMatched-PairAnalysisRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statisticsReproducibilityofResultsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsResearchDesign:statistics&numericaldataRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.
K. Schulz, D. Altman, and D. Moher. Annals of internal medicine, 152 (11): 726-32 (June 2010)5545<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 0372351; aheadofprint;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Publishing
Publishing:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
PublishingPublishing:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review.
G. Cordoba, L. Schwartz, S. Woloshin, H. Bae, and P. Gøtzsche. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), (January 2010)5713<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 8900488; CIN: BMJ. 2010;341:c3529. PMID: 20719822; OID: NLM: PMC2923692; epublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Comparacions múltiples; Composite endpoints.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
DataInterpretation
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
Statistical
TreatmentOutcome
RCT
DataInterpretationRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsStatisticalTreatmentOutcomeRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Lies, damn lies, and statistics.
S. Yentis. Anaesthesia, 67 (5): 455-6 (May 2012)6819<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 0370524; CON: Anaesthesia. 2012 May;67(5):521-37. PMID: 22404311; 2012/03/08 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació; Ètica.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Animals
DataInterpretation
Female
Humans
Male
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statistics
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
ResearchDesign:statistics&numericaldata
Statistical
RCT
AnimalsDataInterpretationFemaleHumansMaleRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statisticsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsResearchDesign:statistics&numericaldataStatisticalRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.
J. Dumville, D. Torgerson, and C. Hewitt. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 332 (7547): 969-71 (April 2006)4285<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; PUBM: Print; JID: 8900488; RF: 11; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Generalització.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Bias(Epidemiology)
DataInterpretation
Follow-UpStudies
PatientDropouts
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statistics
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
Statistical
RCT
Bias(Epidemiology)DataInterpretationFollow-UpStudiesPatientDropoutsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statisticsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsStatisticalRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
I. Boutron, D. Moher, D. Altman, K. Schulz, and P. Ravaud. Annals of internal medicine, 148 (4): 295-309 (February 2008)4489<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>PUBM: Print; JID: 0372351; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Publishing
Publishing:standards
QualityControl
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
Therapeutics
Therapeutics:standards
RCT
PublishingPublishing:standardsQualityControlRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsTherapeuticsTherapeutics:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designs.
A. Donner. Statistics in medicine, 11 (6): 743-50 (April 1992)3014<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Sample size.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ClusterAnalysis
Humans
Matched-PairAnalysis
ProportionalHazardsModels
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
SamplingStudies
RCT
ClusterAnalysisHumansMatched-PairAnalysisProportionalHazardsModelsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsSamplingStudiesRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1CONSORT guidelines applied to an exemplar paper.
R. Newcombe. International endodontic journal, 37 (1): 3-6 (January 2004)4861<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20080807; JID: 8004996; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
GuidelineAdherence
GuidelinesasTopic
Humans
PeriodicalsasTopic
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
GuidelineAdherenceGuidelinesasTopicHumansPeriodicalsasTopicRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Evaluating patient-centered outcomes in the randomized controlled trial and beyond: informing the future with lessons from the past.
C. Booth. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 16 (24): 5963-71 (December 2010)6080<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>CI: (c)2010; JID: 9502500; ppublish;.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
EndpointDetermination
Humans
Investigational
Investigational:methods
Investigational:trends
MedicalOncology
MedicalOncology:methods
MedicalOncology:trends
OutcomeAssessment(HealthCare)
Patient-CenteredCare
Patient-CenteredCare:methods
Patient-CenteredCare:trends
ProfessionalPractice
ProfessionalPractice:trends
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:trends
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
ResearchDesign:trends
Therapies
TreatmentOutcome
RCT
EndpointDeterminationHumansInvestigationalInvestigational:methodsInvestigational:trendsMedicalOncologyMedicalOncology:methodsMedicalOncology:trendsOutcomeAssessment(HealthCare)Patient-CenteredCarePatient-CenteredCare:methodsPatient-CenteredCare:trendsProfessionalPracticeProfessionalPractice:trendsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:trendsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsResearchDesign:trendsTherapiesTreatmentOutcomeRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Comparative effectiveness clinical trials in psychiatry: superiority, noninferiority, and the role of active comparators.
A. Leon. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 72 (10): 1344-9 (October 2011)7069<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20120815; CI: (c) Copyright 2011; GR: MH060447/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States; GR: MH068638/MH/NIMH NIH HHS/United States; JID: 7801243; CIN: J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1350-2. PMID: 22075101; 2010/03/03 received; 2010/05/10 accepted; 2011/02/08 aheadofprint; ppublish;.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standards
Humans
Psychiatry
Psychiatry:methods
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
ComparativeEffectivenessResearchComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standardsHumansPsychiatryPsychiatry:methodsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Statistics notes: missing outcomes in randomised trials.
A. Vickers, and D. Altman. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), (January 2013)7403<br/>JID: 8900488; epublish;<br/>Dades censurades; RCT; Introductori; Imputació múltiple.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
DataCollection
DataCollection:methods
DataInterpretation
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statistics
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
Statistical
TreatmentOutcome
RCT
DataCollectionDataCollection:methodsDataInterpretationRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statisticsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsStatisticalTreatmentOutcomeRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials.
L. Rios, C. Ye, and L. Thabane. BMC medical research methodology, (January 2010)6222<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20100928; JID: 100968545; OID: NLM: PMC2834676; 2009/04/25 received; 2010/02/05 accepted; 2010/02/05 aheadofprint; epublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Disseny; RCT; Publicació.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
DataInterpretation
Endocrinology
Endocrinology:methods
EpidemiologicMethods
Humans
PeriodicalsasTopic
PeriodicalsasTopic:standards
QualityControl
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
ReviewLiteratureasTopic
Statistical
RCT
DataInterpretationEndocrinologyEndocrinology:methodsEpidemiologicMethodsHumansPeriodicalsasTopicPeriodicalsasTopic:standardsQualityControlRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsReviewLiteratureasTopicStatisticalRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Generalizability of the results of randomized trials.
N. Weiss, T. Koepsell, and B. Psaty. Archives of internal medicine, 168 (2): 133-5 (January 2008)4341<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>PUBM: Print; JID: 0372440; CON: Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jan 28;168(2):136-40. PMID: 18227358; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Generalització.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Humans
PatientSelection
RandomAllocation
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
HumansPatientSelectionRandomAllocationRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement.
J. Gagnier, H. Boon, P. Rochon, D. Moher, J. Barnes, and C. Bombardier. Annals of internal medicine, 144 (5): 364-7 (March 2006)4000<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Publicació.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
HerbalMedicine
Publishing
Publishing:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
HerbalMedicinePublishingPublishing:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature.
M. Alshurafa, M. Briel, E. Akl, T. Haines, P. Moayyedi, S. Gentles, L. Rios, C. Tran, N. Bhatnagar, F. Lamontagne and 2 other author(s). PloS one, 7 (11): e49163 (January 2012)7091<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 101285081; 2012/04/13 received; 2012/10/04 accepted; 2012/11/15 epublish; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Intention to treat.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
IntentiontoTreatAnalysis
IntentiontoTreatAnalysis:methods
IntentiontoTreatAnalysis:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
SelectionBias
TerminologyasTopic
RCT
IntentiontoTreatAnalysisIntentiontoTreatAnalysis:methodsIntentiontoTreatAnalysis:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsSelectionBiasTerminologyasTopicRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Lessons from and cautions about noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.
P. Gøtzsche. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 295 (10): 1172-4 (March 2006)4378<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20071115; PUBM: Print; JID: 7501160; CON: JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1147-51. PMID: 16522835; CON: JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1152-60. PMID: 16522836; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Tests d'equivalència.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Publishing
Publishing:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
TherapeuticEquivalency
RCT
PublishingPublishing:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsTherapeuticEquivalencyRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Another point of view: superiority, noninferiority, and the role of active comparators.
H. Kraemer. The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 72 (10): 1350-2 (October 2011)7070<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20120815; CI: (c) Copyright 2011; JID: 7801243; CON: J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1344-9. PMID: 21367350; 2010/09/30 received; 2010/09/30 accepted; ppublish;.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch
ComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standards
Humans
Psychiatry
Psychiatry:methods
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
ComparativeEffectivenessResearchComparativeEffectivenessResearch:standardsHumansPsychiatryPsychiatry:methodsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Regulatory issues of propensity score methodology application to drug and device safety studies.
M. Levenson, and L. Yue. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 23 (1): 110-21 (January 2013)7227<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 9200436; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Propensity score; Normativa.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
DeviceApproval
DeviceApproval:legislation&jurisprudence
DeviceApproval:standards
EquipmentSafety
EquipmentSafety:standards
Humans
PharmaceuticalPreparations
PharmaceuticalPreparations:adverseeffects
PropensityScore
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:legislation
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:legislation&jurisprudence
ResearchDesign:standards
RCT
DeviceApprovalDeviceApproval:legislation&jurisprudenceDeviceApproval:standardsEquipmentSafetyEquipmentSafety:standardsHumansPharmaceuticalPreparationsPharmaceuticalPreparations:adverseeffectsPropensityScoreRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:legislationRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsResearchDesignResearchDesign:legislation&jurisprudenceResearchDesign:standardsRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials.
K. Robinson, and S. Goodman. Annals of internal medicine, 154 (1): 50-5 (January 2011)6029<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 0372351; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Cerca bibliogràfica.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Humans
Meta-AnalysisasTopic
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standards
RandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statistics
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
SampleSize
RCT
HumansMeta-AnalysisasTopicRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:standardsRandomizedControlledTrialsasTopic:statisticsResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsSampleSizeRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Small N designs for rehabilitation research.
S. Barnett, A. Heinemann, A. Libin, A. Houts, J. Gassaway, S. Sen-Gupta, A. Resch, and D. Brossart. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 49 (1): 175-86 (January 2012)6745<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 8410047; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Disseny; N-of-1; Sample size; Rehabilitació.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
GuidelinesasTopic
HealthServicesResearch
HealthServicesResearch:methods
Humans
Models
Rehabilitation
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
SampleSize
Theoretical
RCT
GuidelinesasTopicHealthServicesResearchHealthServicesResearch:methodsHumansModelsRehabilitationResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsSampleSizeTheoreticalRCT
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard

⟨⟨
⟨
1
2
⟩
⟩⟩

BibSonomy

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

publications (hide)24
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...

1Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality.

1CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.

1Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review.

1Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

1Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.

1Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.

1Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designs.

1CONSORT guidelines applied to an exemplar paper.

1Evaluating patient-centered outcomes in the randomized controlled trial and beyond: informing the future with lessons from the past.

1Comparative effectiveness clinical trials in psychiatry: superiority, noninferiority, and the role of active comparators.

1Statistics notes: missing outcomes in randomised trials.

1Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials.

1Generalizability of the results of randomized trials.

1Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement.

1Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature.

1Lessons from and cautions about noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.

1Another point of view: superiority, noninferiority, and the role of active comparators.

1Regulatory issues of propensity score methodology application to drug and device safety studies.

1A systematic examination of the citation of prior research in reports of randomized, controlled trials.

1Small N designs for rehabilitation research.

browse

related tags

bookmarks (hide) displayallbookmarks onlybookmarks per page5102050100 sort byadded attitle RSSBibTeXXML

publications (hide)24 displayallpublications onlypublications per page5102050100 sort byadded attitleauthorpublication dateentry typehelp for advanced sorting... RSSBibTeXRDFmore...

browse

related tags

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

publications (hide)24
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...