tag :: ReferenceStandards

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

No matching posts.

⟨⟨
⟨
⟩
⟩⟩

publications (hide)9
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...

1Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.
A. Rutjes, J. Reitsma, A. Coomarasamy, K. Khan, and P. Bossuyt. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 11 (50): iii, ix-51 (December 2007)5561<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 9706284; RF: 118; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
DiagnosticTechniquesandProcedures
Humans
ProcessAssessment(HealthCare)
ReferenceStandards
SensitivityandSpecificity
DiagnosticTechniquesandProceduresHumansProcessAssessment(HealthCare)ReferenceStandardsSensitivityandSpecificity
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
P. Whiting, A. Rutjes, M. Westwood, S. Mallett, J. Deeks, J. Reitsma, M. Leeflang, J. Sterne, and P. Bossuyt. Annals of internal medicine, 155 (8): 529-36 (October 2011)6383<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques; Critical appraisal; Checklist.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Bias(Epidemiology)
Diagnosis
Evidence-BasedMedicine
Humans
PatientSelection
QualityControl
Questionnaires
ReferenceStandards
ReviewLiteratureasTopic
TimeFactors
Bias(Epidemiology)DiagnosisEvidence-BasedMedicineHumansPatientSelectionQualityControlQuestionnairesReferenceStandardsReviewLiteratureasTopicTimeFactors
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
2Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?
T. Baguley. British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 100 (Pt 3): 603-17 (August 2009)5362<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 0373124; 2008/11/17 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Tamaño del efecto.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ConfidenceIntervals
EndpointDetermination
GuidelinesasTopic
Humans
Models
Psychology
Psychology:methods
Psychology:statistics&numericaldata
ReferenceStandards
ReproducibilityofResults
Research
Research:statistics&numericaldata
ResearchDesign
ResearchDesign:standards
Statistical
StatisticsasTopic
StatisticsasTopic:methods
ConfidenceIntervalsEndpointDeterminationGuidelinesasTopicHumansModelsPsychologyPsychology:methodsPsychology:statistics&numericaldataReferenceStandardsReproducibilityofResultsResearchResearch:statistics&numericaldataResearchDesignResearchDesign:standardsStatisticalStatisticsasTopicStatisticsasTopic:methods
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Adjusting for baseline: change or percentage change?
L. Kaiser. Statistics in medicine, 8 (10): 1183-90 (October 1989)2999<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Mesures de contrast.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ClinicalTrialsasTopic
ClinicalTrialsasTopic:standards
ClusterAnalysis
ComputerSimulation
DataInterpretation
DecisionSupportTechniques
DrugTherapy
DrugTherapy:statistics&numericaldata
Models
NormalDistribution
PredictiveValueofTests
ReferenceStandards
Statistical
ClinicalTrialsasTopicClinicalTrialsasTopic:standardsClusterAnalysisComputerSimulationDataInterpretationDecisionSupportTechniquesDrugTherapyDrugTherapy:statistics&numericaldataModelsNormalDistributionPredictiveValueofTestsReferenceStandardsStatistical
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Concordance analysis: part 16 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
R. Kwiecien, A. Kopp-Schneider, and M. Blettner. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 108 (30): 515-21 (July 2011)6849<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>JID: 101475967; OID: NLM: PMC3165924; 2010/11/22 received; 2011/05/11 accepted; 2011/07/29 epublish; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Mesures de concordància; Introductori.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
ComputerGraphics
ConfidenceIntervals
Diagnosis
DiagnosticErrors
DiagnosticErrors:statistics&numericaldata
Differential
EvaluationStudiesasTopic
Humans
MathematicalComputing
ObserverVariation
PredictiveValueofTests
Publishing
Publishing:statistics&numericaldata
ReferenceStandards
ComputerGraphicsConfidenceIntervalsDiagnosisDiagnosticErrorsDiagnosticErrors:statistics&numericaldataDifferentialEvaluationStudiesasTopicHumansMathematicalComputingObserverVariationPredictiveValueofTestsPublishingPublishing:statistics&numericaldataReferenceStandards
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal.
Y. Brink, and Q. Louw. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 18 (6): 1126-32 (December 2012)7017<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>CI: (c) 2011; JID: 9609066; 2011/06/20 aheadofprint; ppublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Validació d'escales; Critical appraisal; Mesures de resultats.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Humans
ObserverVariation
Psychometrics
Psychometrics:standards
Questionnaires
Questionnaires:standards
ReferenceStandards
ReproducibilityofResults
HumansObserverVariationPsychometricsPsychometrics:standardsQuestionnairesQuestionnaires:standardsReferenceStandardsReproducibilityofResults
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.
G. Bornhöft, S. Maxion-Bergemann, U. Wolf, G. Kienle, A. Michalsen, H. Vollmar, S. Gilbertson, and P. Matthiessen. BMC medical research methodology, (January 2006)5510<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>LR: 20091118; JID: 100968545; OID: NLM: PMC1764896; 2006/06/27 received; 2006/12/11 accepted; 2006/12/11 aheadofprint; epublish;<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Critical appraisal; Checklist.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Bias(Epidemiology)
ClinicalTrialsasTopic
ClinicalTrialsasTopic:methods
ClinicalTrialsasTopic:standards
DataInterpretation
EvaluationStudiesasTopic
GuidelinesasTopic
Humans
InformedConsent
PatientSelection
QualityControl
ReferenceStandards
ReproducibilityofResults
ResearchDesign
SelectionBias
Statistical
TreatmentOutcome
Bias(Epidemiology)ClinicalTrialsasTopicClinicalTrialsasTopic:methodsClinicalTrialsasTopic:standardsDataInterpretationEvaluationStudiesasTopicGuidelinesasTopicHumansInformedConsentPatientSelectionQualityControlReferenceStandardsReproducibilityofResultsResearchDesignSelectionBiasStatisticalTreatmentOutcome
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
C. Naaktgeboren, J. de Groot, M. van Smeden, K. Moons, and J. Reitsma. Annals of internal medicine, 159 (3): 195-202 (August 2013)7418<m:linebreak></m:linebreak>Proves diagnòstiques; Bias.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
Bias(Epidemiology)
DiagnosticTests
Humans
ReferenceStandards
RiskAssessment
Routine
Routine:standards
Bias(Epidemiology)DiagnosticTestsHumansReferenceStandardsRiskAssessmentRoutineRoutine:standards
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard
1Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.
T. Sato, and Y. Matsuyama. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 14 (6): 680-6 (November 2003)Propensity score; IPTW; SMRW; Marginal structural models.
2 years ago by @jepcastel
show all tags
AntineoplasticAgents
BreastNeoplasms
BreastNeoplasms:drugtherapy
BreastNeoplasms:physiopathology
BreastNeoplasms:prevention&control
Causality
ConfoundingFactors(Epidemiology)
EpidemiologicStudies
Female
Hormonal
Hormonal:therapeuticuse
Humans
Nonparametric
Probability
Recurrence
ReferenceStandards
Risk
Statistics
Tamoxifen
Tamoxifen:therapeuticuse
AntineoplasticAgentsBreastNeoplasmsBreastNeoplasms:drugtherapyBreastNeoplasms:physiopathologyBreastNeoplasms:prevention&controlCausalityConfoundingFactors(Epidemiology)EpidemiologicStudiesFemaleHormonalHormonal:therapeuticuseHumansNonparametricProbabilityRecurrenceReferenceStandardsRiskStatisticsTamoxifenTamoxifen:therapeuticuse
(0)
copydeleteadd this publication to your clipboard

⟨⟨
⟨
1
⟩
⟩⟩

BibSonomy

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

publications (hide)9
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...

1Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.

1QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

2Standardized or simple effect size: what should be reported?

1Adjusting for baseline: change or percentage change?

1Concordance analysis: part 16 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

1Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal.

1Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.

1Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.

1Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.

browse

related tags

bookmarks (hide) displayallbookmarks onlybookmarks per page5102050100 sort byadded attitle RSSBibTeXXML

publications (hide)9 displayallpublications onlypublications per page5102050100 sort byadded attitleauthorpublication dateentry typehelp for advanced sorting... RSSBibTeXRDFmore...

browse

related tags

bookmarks (hide)
display
all
bookmarks only
bookmarks per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
RSS
BibTeX
XML

publications (hide)9
display
all
publications only
publications per page
5
10
20
50
100
sort by
added at
title
author
publication date
entry type
help for advanced sorting...
RSS
BibTeX
RDF
more...