#R2
R2 is a measure on how much better (R2 >0) a model fits the data than simply using the mean of the output variable.
##Properties/Variants
This article states, that adding new input variables will always increase the R2 value. While this is true, when fitting a model and calculating R2 on all available data. However, as soon as we have a training/test split, this does not (should not) hold, i.e., consider adding a very strong outlier in the test data.
##Note on adjusted R2
"Adjusted R2 does not have the same interpretation as R2—while R2 is a measure of fit, adjusted R2 is instead a comparative measure of suitability of alternative nested sets of explanators.[citation needed] As such, care must be taken in interpreting and reporting this statistic. Adjusted R2 is particularly useful in the feature selection stage of model building."
This means, that the **adjusted R2** is basically for fitting models (not necessarily prediction) where the model is to be kept as simple as possible, i.e., it implements an Occams Razor. This is similar to the general behavior of Bayesian model comparison, where a better fit of the observations by adding additional variables is weighted against the complexity of the model (see MixedTrails).
The economics of deficit irrigation are examined. The concepts developed in the heuristic discussion are developed into a set of rigorous mathematical expressions for determination of optimum water use under deficit irrigation. These expressions also can be used to estimate the range of water use within which deficit irrigation would be more profitable than full irrigation. The expressions are completely general in the sense that they can be used with any crop production function and cost functi...