Human gaming tactics draw analogies from the physical world to hide the underlying complexity (chunking), and enable the players to think at a higher level. AlphaGo isnt limited(?) by physical world analogies.
The limitations of backpropagation learning can now be overcome by using multilayer neural networks that contain top-down connections and training them to /generate/ sensory data rather than to classify it. (...) much better than previous approaches
* Google has access to WorldCat metadata
* Google says bad metadata comes from external providers
* No restrictions on which WorldCat metadata fields can be used
Today’s post is not to argue that the settlement should be approved, but to consider what the situation will be if the settlement is rejected. The proponents and opponents of the settlement certainly seem to differ on what the world will look like if the settlement is approved; might there be somewhat greater agreement between the sides about what the world will look like if the settlement is rejected?
"This blog, the result of a collaboration between myself and the Institute for the Future of the Book, is dedicated to exploring the process of writing a critical interpretation of the actions and intentions behind the cultural behemoth that is Google, Inc."