Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is sorely disappointed to report that on Friday, August 28, 2020, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) issued its initial decision denying the request for correction that we — together with ten 9/11 family members and 88 architects and structural engineers — submitted on April 15, 2020, regarding NIST’s 2008 report on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.
Maa on litteä kuin pannukakku, ihminen ei ole koskaan käynyt Kuussa, ja World Trade Center purettiin räjähteiden avulla. Salaliittoteoreetikot esittävät mitä kummallisimpia väitteitä – mutta tiede kumoaa väitteet yhden toisensa jälkeen.
tiistai 19. kesäkuuta 2018 teksti Esben Schouboe
By Adam Taylor ... "Editor’s Note: This is Part 8 (see Part 7) of an extensive report by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor that exposes the fallacies and flaws in the arguments made by the editors of Popular Mechanics (PM) in the latest edition of their book Debunking 9/11 Myths. "... "PM notes that the rubble pile was not exactly “neat,” since nearby structures such as the Fiterman Hall and the Verizon Building were structurally damaged by debris from Building 7. While it is true there was damage to surrounding structures, this may have simply been due to the fact that WTC7 was a particularly large structure... [...] In fact, the FEMA report had this to say about Building 7’s debris pile:
“The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion… The average debris field radius was approximately 70 feet." (Jfr. http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/fema_wtc/fema403_ch5.pdf )
Dave Thomas, Skeptical Inquirer Volume 35.4, July/August 2011: "After ten years, the pesky 911 Truth movement has refined its arguments but still hasnt proved the attacks were an inside job. Their key claims are refuted on multiple grounds."
On "the Verizon and Fiterman Hall structures": "In actuality, it twisted and tilted over to one side as it fell, and parts of the building severely damaged two neighboring buildings (the Verizon and Fiterman Hall structures). When challenged with the obvious fact that Tower 7 spilled far outside its footprint,..."
Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate
By John D. Wyndham | Oct 7, 2016 | Essays, Science, US | 18 |
John D. Wyndham, FPJ 7 Oct 2016
Bringing Closure to the 9/11 Pentagon Debate
It’s time for the 9/11 truth movement to resolve its Pentagon debate by applying the scientific method. Doing so points conclusively to large plane impact.
He graduated with a first class honors in Engineering from Edinburgh University in 1977 and joined Arup in London as a structural engineer the same year. David moved to New York in 1998 to take up a key role in the Arup Buildings Business in the United St
"Another work of fantasy from DRG. If you buy into the work of a theologian to understand science, you're part of the problem. Good old explosive demolition, except of course the explosives are silent. Magical super thermite. Ignoring the full collapse to
Just before the two World Trade Centre skyscrapers crashed to the ground on September 11, 2001, a series of huge blasts were heard in the buildings. And a leading scientist says they could have been the sound of molten aircraft metal reacting with water f