In 2009 the legislature, judges & DPP each turned their attention to issues around assisted suicide. The legislature decided not to change the law. The judges decided the existing law was insufficiently clear & required the DPP to clarify it. The DPP flirted with reforming the law, but then drew back from such a legislative role. His published policy has been considered as a contribution to the regulation of death & dying, & as such has been found wanting. However, considered in the context of the proper roles of Parliament, courts & prosecutors, & seen as an exercise in constitutional restraint, the DPP's approach should be appraised rather differently. From this perspective, the decision of the HL in Purdy raises significant concerns for the legitimacy of decision making in the contested moral issues that arise in healthcare ethics. In our democracy, courts should be wary of usurping legislative authority in areas where the Parliamentary position is clear. …
Tony, 47, and Barrie Drewitt-Barlow, 42, of Chandlers Quay, Maldon, who were Britain's first gay surrogate parents, denied one charge of providing false information to an ethics panel. The pair, who ran Euroderm Research, also deny two counts of not conforming to protocol when conducting a trial. The pair appeared before Southwark Crown Court on Wednesday. They also deny two charges of conducting a clinical trial otherwise than in accordance of good clinical practice.