People have ideas about science based on personal experiences, previous education, popular media and peer culture. Many of these ideas are commonly held misconceptions or myths about the nature of science. Here are some of the more common myths that are problematic in science education.
Die Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften ist eine außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtung in München. Sie betreibt Grundlagenforschung und Langzeitprojekte in den Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften und pflegt den wissenschaftlichen Gedankenaustausch unter ihren Mitgliedern.
Science should be done with all the "best" words. Data is shown via tweets. Folks with "intelligence" not to be trusted. China is mathematically removed in climate change projections. Hypotheses all end with a "CHA-CHING!" Scientific credentials include showing your birth certificate. "Pussy" is a medically recognized term. Citations include lawsuits. Expert peer review still sound, except for the bit about "expert." All computer stuff to be done by some guy in New Jersey: not Russia. Breibart News is a credible scientific source. Scientific community includes that crazy relative of yours who believes mermaids are real but climate change is not. Impact factor to be replaced with "Is it YUGE?" factor. Bullshit, now the norm.
Two great problems of learning confront humanity: learning about the nature of the universe and about ourselves and other living things as a part of the universe, and learning how to become civilized. The first problem was solved, in essence, in the seventeenth century, with the creation of modern science. But the second problem has not yet been solved. Solving the first problem without also solving the second puts us in a situation of great danger. All our current global problems have arisen as a result. What we need to do, in response to this unprecedented crisis, is learn from our solution to the first problem how to solve the second. In this ebook, Nicholas Maxwell revisits the eighteenth-century Enlightenment in order to correct the defective vision on which the academic structures of today have been built. This will allow us, Maxwell argues, to succeed where the Enlightenment tried but failed: to learn from scientific progress how to go about making social progress towards as good a world as possible. The result would be a revolution in the nature of academic inquiry as a whole, which would finally take up its proper task of helping humanity learn how to become wiser by increasingly cooperatively rational means.
Leseempfehlungen zur Laborjournal Kolumne: Einsichten eines Wissenschaftsnarren (6): Yong, E. The Absurdity of the Nobel Prizes in Science - The Atlantic Knorr-Cetina, Karin D.: Epistemic Cultures - How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999 Einsichten eines Wissenschaftsnarren (5): Kimmelman J, Mogil JS, Dirnagl U. Distinguishing between exploratory and…
Die Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften ist eine außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtung in München. Sie betreibt Grundlagenforschung und Langzeitprojekte in den Geistes- und Naturwissenschaften und pflegt den wissenschaftlichen Gedankenaustausch unter ihren Mitgliedern.
Kritik der Kritik (10): Immer noch können sich Naturwissenschaftler mit dem schützenden Mythos der Sachlichkeit umgeben. Um sie zu kritisieren, ist es notwendig, sich in die Produktionsbedingungen naturwissenschaftlichen Wissens hineinzudenken