It is not uncommon, in the context of academic debates over computer science and Web standards topics, to see the publication of one or more "considered harmful" essays. These essays have existed in some form for more than three decades now, and it has become obvious that their time has passed.
Some administrators claim that Reply-To munging makes it easier for users to respond to the entire list, and helps encourage list traffic. These benefits are fallacious. Moreover, Reply-To can have harmful -- even dangerous -- effects. If you think Reply-To munging is a good idea, I hope I can change your mind.
In the past few years, the popularity of WordPress has skyrocketed, which has led to a growing demand for themes. With this growing demand, we've seen new
T. Omori, and K. Maruyama. MSR '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Mining software repositories, page 31--34. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (May 2008)
A. Desilets, S. Paquet, and N. Vinson. International Symposium on Wikis: Proceedings of the 2005 international symposium on Wikis, 16 (18):
3--15(2005)