Die EU würde von den Briten gerne bald wissen, wie die sich die künftigen Beziehungen vorstellen. In Brüssel hält man ein Handelsabkommen für wahrscheinlich, das sich an das CETA-Abkommen anlehnt, das man mit Kanada ausgehandelt hatte. Doch erst im März gibt sich die EU Leitlinien für die anstehenden Verhandlungen.
The government’s trade bill has its second reading on Tuesday, something which has gone unnoticed by many campaigners and commentators, let alone the wider population. And that’s a problem. Anyone who cares about democracy, our nation’s prosperity and the future of post-Brexit Britain, should care deeply. It is nowhere near as innocuous as it sounds. It’s a Trojan horse.
If Donald Trump has his way then a “very big and exciting” trade deal between the US and UK is imminent. However, it often takes years to negotiate tariff
Der britische Brexit-Minister David Davis will dem Europäischen Gerichtshof (EuGH) noch Jahre nach dem EU-Austritt seines Landes das letzte Wort in Rechtsfragen einräumen.
The City’s top financial watchdog has said there is no reason why financial services should be excluded from a post-Brexit free trade agreement between the UK and the EU.
The EU recently proposed a single trade agreement with the United States, so there is no reason it cannot have one with the UK post-Brexit, according to the chief executive of the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
It has become clear, if it wasn’t before, that there is a fundamental choice between pursuing progressive policies and a hard Brexit. Rather than enabling Corbyn’s Britain – the regulations, state aid and nationalisation desired by many on the Left – a hard Brexit could derail these visions. Leaving the EU isn’t just going to consume government and parliament now, it is likely to dominate the next decade, politically and financially constraining any government in the future.