Author of the publication

A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes

. Stat Med, 26 (19): 3550-3565 (August 2007)
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2813

Please choose a person to relate this publication to

To differ between persons with the same name, the academic degree and the title of an important publication will be displayed. You can also use the button next to the name to display some publications already assigned to the person.

 

Other publications of authors with the same name

Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study, , , and . Stat Med, 26 (4): 754-768 (February 2007)Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates. Stat Med, 31 (29): 3946-3958 (December 2012)A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med, 27 (12): 2037-2049 (May 2008)Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 17 (12): 1218-1225 (December 2008)Absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to treat can be obtained from adjusted survival models for time-to-event outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol, 63 (1): 46-55 (January 2010)The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments. Stat Med, 33 (7): 1242-1258 (March 2014)The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks. J Clin Epidemiol, 61 (6): 537-545 (June 2008)A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes. Stat Med, 26 (19): 3550-3565 (August 2007)Feed forward in stochastic control systems.. University of Cambridge, UK, (1979)British Library, EThOS.A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study, , and . Stat Med, 26 (4): 734-753 (February 2007)