- First, event management is primarily about the identification and generation of business events from the ambient events. Similar to what Carole-Ann and I had written in previous posts.- Second, IBM wants to introduce high level EPLs to express the logic for that processing that are business-centric, something very similar to what Business Rules Languages and approaches are in the business rules management area.
- leave anything related to transport, communication to other layers- use this revised CEP to express and execute event-relevant logic, the purpose of which is to translate the ambient events into relevant business events- have these business events trigger business processes (however lightweight you want to make them)- have these business processes invoke decision services implemented through decision management to decide what they should be doing at every step- have the business processes invoke action services to execute the actions decided by the decision services- all the while generating business events or ambient events- etc.
On Event Processing Agents implies a “new” event processing reference architecture with terms like,
(1) simple event processing agents for filtering and routing,
(2) mediated event processing agents for event enrichment, transformation, validation,
(3) complex event processing agents for pattern detection, and
(4) intelligent event processing agents for prediction, decisions.
Frankly, while I generally agree with the concepts, I think the terms in On Event Processing Agents tend to add to the confusion because these concepts in On Event Processing Agents are following, almost exactly, the same reference architecture (and terms) for MSDF, illustrated again below to aid the reader.
A. Bogoni, W. Xiaoxia, I. Fazal, and A. Willner. Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers, 2009.
OFC 2009. Conference on, page 1-3--. (2009)
M. Phillips, J. Nguyen, and A. Mischke. Advances in Speech Recognition: Mobile Environments, Call Centers and Clinics, chapter 3, Springer, New York, (2010)
A. McAndrew, and A. Venables. SIGCSE '05: Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, page 337--341. New York, NY, USA, ACM, (2005)- Kuvaprosessoinnin osa-alueita opetettiin yläkoululaisille: kvantisointi, kohinanpoisto, yms.
- Oppilaat tyytyväisiä
- Ei syytä miksei voisi opettaa jo ennen undergraduate/post-graduate tasoa.
R. Neßelrath, and J. Alexandersson. Proceedings of the 6th IJCAI Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, Pasadena, CA, USA, page 46-51. (2009)
M. Schwab, R. Jäschke, and F. Fischer. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Natural Language and Speech Processing, page 99--109. Association for Computational Linguistics, (2023)