The following table shows the values that are used when -XX:+UseContainerSupport is set:
Less than 1 GB 50% <size>
1 GB - 2 GB <size> - 512 MB
Greater than 2 GB 75% <size>
The default heap size is capped at 25 GB
The default heap size for containers takes affect only when the following conditions are met:
The application is running in a container environment.
The memory limit for the container is set.
The -XX:+UseContainerSupport option is set, which is the default behavior.
moving:
to the end of the command: ctrl-e
to the begin of the command: ctrl-a
forward a word: alt-f
backword a word: alt-b
deleting:
from current cursor position to the end of word: ald-d
from current cursor position to the begin of word: clt-w
<dispatcher>FORWARD</dispatcher>
<dispatcher>REQUEST</dispatcher>
INCLUDE: Use this for the filter to be applied to any include targets matching a specified servlet name or with URLs matching a specified pattern.
FORWARD: Use this for the filter to be applied to any forward targets matching a specified servlet name or with URLs matching a specified pattern.
REQUEST: Use this in addition to an INCLUDE or FORWARD setting (one <dispatcher> element for each setting) for the filter to also be applied to direct request targets matching a specified servlet name or with URLs matching a specified pattern. (It is nonsensical to use the REQUEST value only. If you want the filter to apply only to direct requests, there is no need to use the <dispatcher> element.)
ERROR: Use this for the filter to be applied under the error page mechanism.
The primary key of the sort is the number of literal characters in the full URI matching pattern.
...
The secondary key of the sort is the number of template expressions embedded within the pattern—that is, {id} or {id : .+}. This sort is in descending order.
...
The tertiary key of the sort is the number of nondefault template expressions. A default template expression is one that does not define a regular expression—that is, {id}.
To help researchers investigate relation extraction, we’re releasing a human-judged dataset of two relations about public figures on Wikipedia: nearly 10,000 examples of “place of birth”, and over 40,000 examples of “attended or graduated from an institution”. Each of these was judged by at least 5 raters, and can be used to train or evaluate relation extraction systems. We also plan to release more relations of new types in the coming months.
At first I just wanted to see how much work it would take to port ZFS to FreeBSD. I started by making it compile on FreeBSD, and once I did that, I was quite sure it would take at least six months to have the first prototype working. The funny thing was that after another week or so, ZFS was running on my test machine
If you have 10,000 front-end users, having a connection pool of 10,000 would be shear insanity. 1000 still horrible. Even 100 connections, overkill. You want a small pool of a few dozen connections at most, and you want the rest of the application threads blocked on the pool awaiting connections.
imagine three threads (Tn=3), each of which requires four connections to perform some task (Cm=4). The pool size required to ensure that deadlock is never possible is:
pool size = 3 x (4 - 1) + 1 = 10
go to settings > devices > keyboard
look for the keyboard shortcut for "Switch windows"
set this to the shortcut Alt+Tab (this will overwrite the old shortcut)
If you now press Alt+Tab you will be able to directly select all open windows without grouping into the different apps.
select * from tbl TABLESAMPLE system (5)
The SYSTEM method is significantly faster than the BERNOULLI method when small sampling percentages are specified, but it may return a less-random sample of the table as a result of clustering effects.
designed to manage user specified directories referred to as sync targets from here on out, in tmpfs and to periodically sync them back to the physical disc (HDD/SSD)
I. Titov, and A. Klementiev. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, page 1445--1455. Portland, Oregon, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (June 2011)
J. Illig, A. Hotho, R. Jäschke, and G. Stumme. Knowledge Processing and Data Analysis, volume 6581 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 10.1007/978-3-642-22140-8_9.(2011)
M. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Su, and G. Zhou. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, page 825--832. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2006)
P. Talukdar, T. Brants, M. Liberman, and F. Pereira. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL-X), page 141--148. New York City, Association for Computational Linguistics, (June 2006)
D. Golland, J. DeNero, and J. Uszkoreit. Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), page 17--22. Jeju Island, Korea, Association for Computational Linguistics, (July 2012)
D. Klein, and C. Manning. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, page 128--135. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (2002)
J. Reynar, and A. Ratnaparkhi. Proceedings of the fifth conference on Applied natural language processing, page 16--19. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (1997)
M. Collins. Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, page 184--191. Stroudsburg, PA, USA, Association for Computational Linguistics, (1996)