C. Gershenson, und F. Heylighen. Advances in Artificial Life, 7th European Conference (ECAL 2003), LNAI 2801, Seite 606-614. Dortmund, Germany, Springer, (2003)
Zusammenfassung
We do not attempt to provide yet another definition of selforganization, but explore the conditions under which we can model a system as self-organizing. These involve the dynamics of entropy, and the purpose, aspects, and description level chosen by an observer. We show how, changing the level or “graining�? of description, the same system can appear selforganizing or self-disorganizing. We discuss ontological issues we face when studying self-organizing systems, and analyse when designing and controlling artificial self-organizing systems is useful. We conclude that self-organization is a way of observing systems, not an absolute class of systems.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 Gershenson2003
%A Gershenson, Carlos
%A Heylighen, Francis
%B Advances in Artificial Life, 7th European Conference (ECAL 2003), LNAI 2801
%C Dortmund, Germany
%D 2003
%I Springer
%K
%P 606-614
%T When Can we Call a System Self-organizing?
%X We do not attempt to provide yet another definition of selforganization, but explore the conditions under which we can model a system as self-organizing. These involve the dynamics of entropy, and the purpose, aspects, and description level chosen by an observer. We show how, changing the level or “graining�? of description, the same system can appear selforganizing or self-disorganizing. We discuss ontological issues we face when studying self-organizing systems, and analyse when designing and controlling artificial self-organizing systems is useful. We conclude that self-organization is a way of observing systems, not an absolute class of systems.
@inproceedings{Gershenson2003,
abstract = {We do not attempt to provide yet another definition of selforganization, but explore the conditions under which we can model a system as self-organizing. These involve the dynamics of entropy, and the purpose, aspects, and description level chosen by an observer. We show how, changing the level or “graining�? of description, the same system can appear selforganizing or self-disorganizing. We discuss ontological issues we face when studying self-organizing systems, and analyse when designing and controlling artificial self-organizing systems is useful. We conclude that self-organization is a way of observing systems, not an absolute class of systems.},
added-at = {2012-08-06T21:22:28.000+0200},
address = {Dortmund, Germany},
author = {Gershenson, Carlos and Heylighen, Francis},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2edff28a982c4af24b553348ccedd2bf3/lucio_duarte},
booktitle = {Advances in Artificial Life, 7th European Conference (ECAL 2003), LNAI 2801},
file = {Gershenson2003.pdf:Gershenson2003.pdf:PDF},
groups = {public},
interhash = {b63261d68496e22f265a122fa5f91fbb},
intrahash = {edff28a982c4af24b553348ccedd2bf3},
keywords = {},
pages = {606-614},
publisher = {Springer},
timestamp = {2012-08-06T21:22:28.000+0200},
title = {When Can we Call a System Self-organizing?},
username = {lucio_duarte},
year = 2003
}