A notion of an epistemic state is introduced as a generalization of common representations suggested for belief change. We define a general contraction operation on epistemic states and give a complete description of belief contraction functions generated by such operations. We describe also the difference between coherentist and foundationalist approaches in this setting and compare their `representation capabilities'.
%0 Journal Article
%1 Bochman1999
%A Bochman, A.
%D 1999
%J Kluwer
%K kiwi
%P 27
%T Contraction of epistemic states: a general theory
%X A notion of an epistemic state is introduced as a generalization of common representations suggested for belief change. We define a general contraction operation on epistemic states and give a complete description of belief contraction functions generated by such operations. We describe also the difference between coherentist and foundationalist approaches in this setting and compare their `representation capabilities'.
@article{Bochman1999,
abstract = {A notion of an epistemic state is introduced as a generalization of common representations suggested for belief change. We define a general contraction operation on epistemic states and give a complete description of belief contraction functions generated by such operations. We describe also the difference between coherentist and foundationalist approaches in this setting and compare their `representation capabilities'.},
added-at = {2008-11-14T13:33:38.000+0100},
author = {Bochman, A.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/25d045301e5bd192ed051cd67ad51fb86/fraktalek},
citeulike-article-id = {3508740},
interhash = {df823f32f9818c7861afb268bfb1c61f},
intrahash = {5d045301e5bd192ed051cd67ad51fb86},
journal = {Kluwer},
keywords = {kiwi},
pages = 27,
posted-at = {2008-11-13 14:13:53},
priority = {2},
timestamp = {2008-11-14T13:33:40.000+0100},
title = {Contraction of epistemic states: a general theory},
year = 1999
}