Experimental ecosystems often function differently than expected under the null hypothesis that intra- and interspecific interactions are identical. Recent theory attributes this to the ‘selection effect’ (dominance by species with particular traits), and the ‘complementarity effect’ (niche differentiation and/or facilitative interactions). Using the Price Equation, I show that the ‘selection effect’ only partially reflects dominance by species with particular traits at the expense of other species, and therefore is only partially analogous to natural selection. I then derive a new, tripartite partition of the difference between observed and expected ecosystem function. The ‘dominance effect’ is analogous to natural selection. ‘Trait-independent complementarity’ occurs when species function better than expected, independent of their traits and not at the expense of other species. ‘Trait-dependent complementarity’ occurs when species with particular traits function better than expected, but not at the expense of other species. I illustrate the application of this new partition using experimental data.
%0 Journal Article
%1 fox_interpreting_2005
%A Fox, Jeremy W.
%D 2005
%J Ecology Letters
%K Equation, Natural Price \_tablet\_modified, biodiversity, complementarity ecosystem effect, function, partition partitioning, selection selection, tripartite
%N 8
%P 846--856
%R 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00795.x
%T Interpreting the ‘selection effect’ of biodiversity on ecosystem function
%U http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00795.x/abstract
%V 8
%X Experimental ecosystems often function differently than expected under the null hypothesis that intra- and interspecific interactions are identical. Recent theory attributes this to the ‘selection effect’ (dominance by species with particular traits), and the ‘complementarity effect’ (niche differentiation and/or facilitative interactions). Using the Price Equation, I show that the ‘selection effect’ only partially reflects dominance by species with particular traits at the expense of other species, and therefore is only partially analogous to natural selection. I then derive a new, tripartite partition of the difference between observed and expected ecosystem function. The ‘dominance effect’ is analogous to natural selection. ‘Trait-independent complementarity’ occurs when species function better than expected, independent of their traits and not at the expense of other species. ‘Trait-dependent complementarity’ occurs when species with particular traits function better than expected, but not at the expense of other species. I illustrate the application of this new partition using experimental data.
@article{fox_interpreting_2005,
abstract = {Experimental ecosystems often function differently than expected under the null hypothesis that intra- and interspecific interactions are identical. Recent theory attributes this to the ‘selection effect’ (dominance by species with particular traits), and the ‘complementarity effect’ (niche differentiation and/or facilitative interactions). Using the Price Equation, I show that the ‘selection effect’ only partially reflects dominance by species with particular traits at the expense of other species, and therefore is only partially analogous to natural selection. I then derive a new, tripartite partition of the difference between observed and expected ecosystem function. The ‘dominance effect’ is analogous to natural selection. ‘Trait-independent complementarity’ occurs when species function better than expected, independent of their traits and not at the expense of other species. ‘Trait-dependent complementarity’ occurs when species with particular traits function better than expected, but not at the expense of other species. I illustrate the application of this new partition using experimental data.},
added-at = {2017-01-09T13:57:26.000+0100},
author = {Fox, Jeremy W.},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/24973c7c97d26f8247b54469a9452645a/yourwelcome},
doi = {10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00795.x},
interhash = {41dc590b779edd553dae92b8bd3eb254},
intrahash = {4973c7c97d26f8247b54469a9452645a},
issn = {1461-0248},
journal = {Ecology Letters},
keywords = {Equation, Natural Price \_tablet\_modified, biodiversity, complementarity ecosystem effect, function, partition partitioning, selection selection, tripartite},
language = {en},
number = 8,
pages = {846--856},
timestamp = {2017-01-09T14:01:11.000+0100},
title = {Interpreting the ‘selection effect’ of biodiversity on ecosystem function},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00795.x/abstract},
urldate = {2012-10-04},
volume = 8,
year = 2005
}