This policy paper on science-industry technology transfer has four emphases: the rationale of recent changes in German science policy, the contribution of diverse transfer channels to economic development as well as the role of IPR in that context, the differences in the institutional framework between Europe and USA regarding academic patenting, and the organisational design of technology transfer offices (TTOs). The extensive literature review highlights the importance of TTOs, the necessity of supporting manifold transfer channels, and continuous government funding of intermediaries. Important open research questions are the relative importance of transfer channels and the optimal size of TTOs.
%0 Unpublished Work
%1 Ledebur2008
%A von Ledebur, Sidonia
%B Strategy
%D 2008
%K links,technology offices,university patenting policy,science-industry science transfer
%T Technology transfer offices and university patenting - A Review
%U http://ideas.repec.org/p/jrp/jrpwrp/2008-033.html
%X This policy paper on science-industry technology transfer has four emphases: the rationale of recent changes in German science policy, the contribution of diverse transfer channels to economic development as well as the role of IPR in that context, the differences in the institutional framework between Europe and USA regarding academic patenting, and the organisational design of technology transfer offices (TTOs). The extensive literature review highlights the importance of TTOs, the necessity of supporting manifold transfer channels, and continuous government funding of intermediaries. Important open research questions are the relative importance of transfer channels and the optimal size of TTOs.
@unpublished{Ledebur2008,
abstract = {This policy paper on science-industry technology transfer has four emphases: the rationale of recent changes in German science policy, the contribution of diverse transfer channels to economic development as well as the role of IPR in that context, the differences in the institutional framework between Europe and USA regarding academic patenting, and the organisational design of technology transfer offices (TTOs). The extensive literature review highlights the importance of TTOs, the necessity of supporting manifold transfer channels, and continuous government funding of intermediaries. Important open research questions are the relative importance of transfer channels and the optimal size of TTOs.},
added-at = {2012-02-27T06:11:36.000+0100},
author = {von Ledebur, Sidonia},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2514d1090be37b5cd08b757308590d7ad/kamil205},
booktitle = {Strategy},
file = {:Users/Miguel/Dropbox/Escola/Artigos/Ledebur\_2008\_Technology transfer offices and university patenting - A Review.pdf:pdf},
institution = {Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics},
interhash = {74dfc8768dae20cf7f9fae14742b97be},
intrahash = {514d1090be37b5cd08b757308590d7ad},
keywords = {links,technology offices,university patenting policy,science-industry science transfer},
series = {Jena Economic Research Papers},
timestamp = {2012-02-27T06:11:46.000+0100},
title = {{Technology transfer offices and university patenting - A Review}},
type = {Jena Economic Research Papers},
url = {http://ideas.repec.org/p/jrp/jrpwrp/2008-033.html},
year = 2008
}