A Comparison of Paper-Based and Online Annotations in the Workplace
R. Kawase, E. Herder, and W. Nejdl. Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, Proceedings of the EC-TEL 2009, volume 5794 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin/Heidelberg, Springer, (October 2009)
Abstract
While reading documents, people commonly make annotations: they underline or highlight text and write comments in the margin. Making annotations during reading activities has been shown to be an efficient method for aiding understanding and interpretation. In this paper we present a comparison of paper-based and online annotations in the workplace. Online annotations were collected in a laboratory study, making use of the Web-based annotation tool SpreadCrumbs. A field study was out to gather paper-based annotations. The results validate the benefits of Web annotations. A comparison of the online annotations with paper-based annotations provides several insights in user needs for enhanced online annotation tools, from which design guidelines can be drawn.
%0 Conference Paper
%1 kawase2009comparison
%A Kawase, Ricardo
%A Herder, Eelco
%A Nejdl, Wolfgang
%B Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, Proceedings of the EC-TEL 2009
%C Berlin/Heidelberg
%D 2009
%E Cress, U.
%E Dimitrova, V.
%E Specht, M.
%I Springer
%K annotation ectel2009 fullPapers
%T A Comparison of Paper-Based and Online Annotations in the Workplace
%V 5794
%X While reading documents, people commonly make annotations: they underline or highlight text and write comments in the margin. Making annotations during reading activities has been shown to be an efficient method for aiding understanding and interpretation. In this paper we present a comparison of paper-based and online annotations in the workplace. Online annotations were collected in a laboratory study, making use of the Web-based annotation tool SpreadCrumbs. A field study was out to gather paper-based annotations. The results validate the benefits of Web annotations. A comparison of the online annotations with paper-based annotations provides several insights in user needs for enhanced online annotation tools, from which design guidelines can be drawn.
@inproceedings{kawase2009comparison,
abstract = {While reading documents, people commonly make annotations: they underline or highlight text and write comments in the margin. Making annotations during reading activities has been shown to be an efficient method for aiding understanding and interpretation. In this paper we present a comparison of paper-based and online annotations in the workplace. Online annotations were collected in a laboratory study, making use of the Web-based annotation tool SpreadCrumbs. A field study was out to gather paper-based annotations. The results validate the benefits of Web annotations. A comparison of the online annotations with paper-based annotations provides several insights in user needs for enhanced online annotation tools, from which design guidelines can be drawn.},
added-at = {2009-09-25T10:36:23.000+0200},
address = {Berlin/Heidelberg},
author = {Kawase, Ricardo and Herder, Eelco and Nejdl, Wolfgang},
biburl = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2c4d47e31483a9d6332c5fe739f69ffa8/ectel09},
booktitle = {Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines, Proceedings of the EC-TEL 2009},
editor = {Cress, U. and Dimitrova, V. and Specht, M.},
interhash = {fd83fbb3af5520340139f5e4439942b0},
intrahash = {c4d47e31483a9d6332c5fe739f69ffa8},
keywords = {annotation ectel2009 fullPapers},
month = {October},
paperid = {1143},
publisher = {Springer},
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
timestamp = {2009-09-25T10:36:26.000+0200},
title = {A Comparison of Paper-Based and Online Annotations in the Workplace},
topic = {Full Papers},
volume = 5794,
year = 2009
}